Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garner v. Kovalakgreen1 sentence2011Prima facie means “at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.” Garner v. Kovalak, 817 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind.Ct.App.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Dusenberry v. Dusenberrygreen1 sentence1998Dusenberry v. Dusenberry, 625 N.E.2d 458, 460 (Ind.Ct.App.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fisher v. BD., MT. PLEASANT TP. COM. SCHOOLS
green
2 sentences1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . 1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Burroughs v. Burroughs
neutral
2 sentences1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . 1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Mullen v. Town of Newcastle
neutral
2 sentences1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . 1991Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 381 , 103 N.E. 1 ; Fisher v. Board of School Trustees (1986), Ind.App., 514 N.E.2d 626, 628 . | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Bartrom v. Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Instead, we will reverse the trial court’s 2 Kevin’s assertion that Bartrom v. Credit Adjustment Bureau, 618 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 1993) is inconsistent with Roberts is in error as Bartrom deals with the doctrine of necessaries and married couples. 3 This theory presumably would not apply if a prenuptial agreement had been made, but the parties have not indicated there was any such agreement. 4 Child support and spousal maintenance are governed by the same statutes. 5 judgment if the appellant demonstrates prima facie error. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
TISDIAL v. Young
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 784-85 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Bergman v. Zempel
green
1 sentence2005Bergman, 807 N.E.2d at 149 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |