case constitutes reversible error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

case constitutes reversible error in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Taylor v. Kentuckygreen
scotus · 1978 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 491 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1937-38 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978) (Where the presumption of innocence in favor of the defendant has been compromised by deficiencies in the trial proceedings, reversal and retrial are constitutionally mandated).

1996See Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 491 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1937-38 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978) (Where the presumption of innocence in favor of the defendant has been compromised by deficiencies in the trial proceedings, reversal and retrial are constitutionally mandated).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Hanrahan v. State green
ind · 1968
2 sentences

1978In holding the trial court committed reversible error in denying the motion without a hearing, the court relied principally on Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325, at 334 , 241 N.E.2d 143, at 148 , wherein it is stated: “We hold that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. * * * [Wjhere the credibility of an uncontroverted verified application is

1978In holding the trial court committed reversible error in denying the motion without a hearing, the court relied principally on Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325, at 334 , 241 N.E.2d 143, at 148 , wherein it is stated: “We hold that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. * * * [Wjhere the credibility of an uncontroverted verified application is

21973–1978
Cooper v. State green
ind · 1972
2 sentences

1973In that case, we found it necessary, as we likewise do here, to reverse Knight’s conviction on the basis of Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325 , 241 N.E.2d 143 , in which the Indiana Supreme Court, in construing Supreme Court Rule l-12c, now CR. 12, held: “. . . that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. . . .” See also: Brown v. State (1969),

1973In that case, we found it necessary, as we likewise do here, to reverse Knight’s conviction on the basis of Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325 , 241 N.E.2d 143 , in which the Indiana Supreme Court, in construing Supreme Court Rule l-12c, now CR. 12, held: “. . . that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. . . .” See also: Brown v. State (1969),

21973–1973
Brown v. State green
ind · 1969
2 sentences

1973In that case, we found it necessary, as we likewise do here, to reverse Knight’s conviction on the basis of Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325 , 241 N.E.2d 143 , in which the Indiana Supreme Court, in construing Supreme Court Rule l-12c, now CR. 12, held: “. . . that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. . . .” See also: Brown v. State (1969),

1973In that case, we found it necessary, as we likewise do here, to reverse Knight’s conviction on the basis of Hanrahan v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 325 , 241 N.E.2d 143 , in which the Indiana Supreme Court, in construing Supreme Court Rule l-12c, now CR. 12, held: “. . . that to deny an uncontroverted, verified application for change of venue without affording petitioner some opportunity to present additional evidence in support of said application is an abuse of discretion by the trial court, and that such a denial in this case constitutes reversible error. . . .” See also: Brown v. State (1969),

21973–1973
Crowdus v. State green
ind · 1982
1 sentence

2012Still, Fields cites Crowdus v. State, 431 N.E.2d 796 (Ind.1982), in,support of his contention that the trial court’s communication to the jury in this case constitutes reversible error.

12012–2012
Gardner v. Lake Eliza Resort green
indctapp · 1979
2 sentences

1982Gardner v. Lake Eliza Resort, supra; Herman v. Ferrell, supra. However, a deliberate attempt by counsel to interject insurance into a case constitutes reversible error.

1982Clouse, citing us to Gardner, supra, contends the interjection of insurance in this case constitutes reversible error since it was done deliberately and in bad faith.

11982–1982
Lamb v. York green
ind · 1969
2 sentences

1979Lamb v. York (1969), 252 Ind. 252 , 247 N.E.2d 197 .

1979Lamb v. York (1969), 252 Ind. 252 , 247 N.E.2d 197 .

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

NY 7 (1912–2013) IN 7 (1973–2012) IL 5 (1964–2002) ID 3 (1987–1990) NJ 3 (2002–2021) TX 3 (1955–1990) MO 3 (1975–1992) OK 2 (1927–1977) TN 2 (2001–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check