Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Mobleygreen2 sentences2015“This rule serves to avoid encouragement of dilatory tactics and further the purposes of the changed circumstances rule.” Smith v. Mobley, 561 N.E.2d 504, 508 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990), trans. denied. [12] Indiana’s relocation statute requires a “relocating individual” to “file a notice of the intent to move” with the appropriate court and with the “nonrelocating individual.” Ind. Code § 31-17-2.2 -1(a). 2004"This rule serves to avoid encouragement of dilatory tactics and further the purposes of the changed circumstances rule." Id. | 1 | 3 |
Kruse v. Krusegreen2 sentences2010See Ind.Code § 31-16-8-1(b)(1); Kruse v. Kruse, 464 N.E.2d 934, 939 (Ind.Ct.App. 1984). [4] But no change in circumstances needs to be shown for a court to make an initial child support order. 1998Id. | 1 | 3 |
David v. Taylor v. Sheryl Crowder Taylorgreen1 sentence2019Taylor v. Taylor, 42 N.E.3d 981, 986 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (footnote and internal citation and quotations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Talarico v. Smithsongreen2 sentences2004In Talarico v. Smithson, Talarico—the custodial parent—requested that a child support modification relate back to the date when Talarico filed her motion to modify child support. 579 N.E.2d 671, 674 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). 2004In Talarico v. Smithson, Talarico-the custodial parent-requested that a child support modification relate back to the date when Talarico filed her motion to modify child support. 579 N.E.2d 671, 674 (Ind.Ct.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.