Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chad Thomas Burnell v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See Ind. Appellate Rule 46(A)(8)(a); Burnell v. State, 110 N.E.3d 1167, 1171 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Morgan v. State, 22 N.E.3d 570, 573 (Ind. 2014); see also Sanders v. State, 704 N.E.2d 119, 123 (Ind. 1999) (holding that the standard of review of the sufficiency of the evidence rebutting a claim of self-defense is the same as for any other sufficiency claim). | 1 | 1 |
Rodregus Morgan v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2017Morgan v. State, 22 N.E.3d 570, 573 (Ind. 2014); see also Sanders v. State, 704 N.E.2d 119, 123 (Ind. 1999) (holding that the standard of review of the sufficiency of the evidence rebutting a claim of self-defense is the same as for any other sufficiency claim). | 1 | 1 |
Randolph v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Randolph v. State, 755 N.E.2d 572, 576 (Ind. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Hood v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Hood v. State, 877 N.E.2d 492, 497 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence2017Wilson, 770 N.E.2d at 800 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Thomas King v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2017“The State may meet this burden by rebutting the defense directly, by affirmatively showing the defendant did not act in self-defense, or by simply relying upon the sufficiency of its evidence in chief.” Id. [9] Our review of an appellant’s challenge of the State’s evidence rebutting a claim of self-defense is the same as for any sufficiency claim. 2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Brent Cole v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2017Cole, 28 N.E.3d at 1137 . [22] Our standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence rebutting a claim of self-defense is the same as the standard for any sufficiency of the evidence claim. 2017Cole, 28 N.E.3d at 1136-37 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.