Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dow Chemical Co. v. Eblinggreen2 sentences2013As our Supreme Court held in Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling, 753 N.E.2d 633, 640 (Ind. 2001), “[t]he use of state tort law to further the dissemination of label information to persons at risk clearly facilitates rather than frustrates the objectives of FIFRA and does not burden [an applicator’s] compliance with FIFRA.” Again, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on this issue was improper. 2013As our Supreme Court held in Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling, 753 N.E.2d 633, 640 (Ind.2001), “[t]he use of state tort law to further the dissemination of label information to persons at risk clearly facilitates rather than frustrates the objectives of FIFRA and does not burden [an applicator’s] compliance with FIFRA.” Again, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on this issue was improper. | 2 | 2 |
cluster 596408green1 sentence2019See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc. , 981 F.2d 107 (3d Cir. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Vogler v. Dominguezgreen1 sentence1999Because we hold that the trial court did not err in denying IMPC’s motion for summary judgment on the Runges' negligence claim, we need not squarely address the parties’ arguments on the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, which is “a rule of evidence which allows an inference of negligence to be drawn from certain surrounding facts.” Vogler v. Dominguez, 624 N.E.2d 56, 61 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), trans. denied (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kennedy v. Guess, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019See T.R. 56(C); Siner , 51 N.E.3d at 1187 ; Kennedy , 806 N.E.2d at 782 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Kathy L. Siner, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine A. Siner v. Kindred Hospital Limited Partnership, d/b/a Kindred Hospital of Indianapolis
green
1 sentence2019See T.R. 56(C); Siner , 51 N.E.3d at 1187 ; Kennedy , 806 N.E.2d at 782 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Shanks v. A.F.E. Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 249 , 416 N.E.2d at 837 -38 . 2018Id. at 249 , 416 N.E.2d at 837 -38 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Beck v. City of Evansville
green
2 sentences2009We note two things with respect to waiver: 1) Ford cited Standard 208 generally to the trial court; and 2) we may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any basis supported by the record, 5 Beck, 842 N.E.2d at 860 . 6 Whether the provisions of Standard 208 preempt the Cooks' failure to warn claim was an issue raised to the trial court and is a question of law that can be decided on this record. 2009We note two things with respect to waiver: 1) Ford cited Standard 208 generally to the trial court; and 2) we may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any basis supported by the record, [5] Beck, 842 N.E.2d at 860 . [6] Whether the provisions of Standard 208 preempt the Cooks' failure to warn claim was an issue raised to the trial court and is a question of law that can be decided on this record. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990We are persuaded by the reasoning of Cipollone v. Liggett Group (1986), 3rd Cir., 789 F.2d 181 , cert. denied (1987), 479 U.S. 1043 , 107 S.Ct. 907 , 93 L.Ed.2d 857 , that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., preempts “those state law damage actions relating to smoking and health that challenge ... the adequacy of the warning on cigarette packages.” Id. at 187 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Martin County, Florida v. Makemson Et Al.; And Okeechobee County, Florida v. Dennis Et Al.
green
2 sentences1990We are persuaded by the reasoning of Cipollone v. Liggett Group (1986), 3rd Cir., 789 F.2d 181 , cert. denied (1987), 479 U.S. 1043 , 107 S.Ct. 907 , 93 L.Ed.2d 857 , that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., preempts “those state law damage actions relating to smoking and health that challenge ... the adequacy of the warning on cigarette packages.” Id. at 187 . 1990We are persuaded by the reasoning of Cipollone v. Liggett Group (1986), 3rd Cir., 789 F.2d 181 , cert. denied (1987), 479 U.S. 1043 , 107 S.Ct. 907 , 93 L.Ed.2d 857 , that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., preempts “those state law damage actions relating to smoking and health that challenge ... the adequacy of the warning on cigarette packages.” Id. at 187 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990We are persuaded by the reasoning of Cipollone v. Liggett Group (1986), 3rd Cir., 789 F.2d 181 , cert. denied (1987), 479 U.S. 1043 , 107 S.Ct. 907 , 93 L.Ed.2d 857 , that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., preempts “those state law damage actions relating to smoking and health that challenge ... the adequacy of the warning on cigarette packages.” Id. at 187 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.