jury is reversible error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

jury is reversible error in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Smith v. Stategreen
ind · 1979 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1998
2 sentences

1998See Smith v. State, 270 Ind. 579, 580 , 388 N.E.2d 484, 485 (1979).

1998See Smith v. State, 270 Ind. 579, 580 , 388 N.E.2d 484, 485 (1979).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Faceson v. State green
indctapp · 1994
1 sentence

2002In arguing his trial counsel’s performance prejudiced his defense, Robinson cites Faceson v. State, 642 N.E.2d 985 (Ind.Ct.App.1994), which held that the trial court committed reversible error when it gave the jury additional instructions on the definitions of “dealing,” “intent,” “delivery,” and “possession.” Robinson argues that his defense was prejudiced because courts have previously held that giving supplemental instructions to a jury is reversible error.

12002–2002
Kiner v. State green
indctapp · 1994
2 sentences

2000Id.

2000Id.

12000–2000
Williams v. State green
ind · 1978
2 sentences

1983Purdy v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 282 , 369 N.E.2d 633 ; Williams v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 430 , 381 N.E.2d 458 .

1983Purdy v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 282 , 369 N.E.2d 633 ; Williams v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 430 , 381 N.E.2d 458 .

11983–1983
Purdy v. State green
ind · 1977
2 sentences

1983Purdy v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 282 , 369 N.E.2d 633 ; Williams v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 430 , 381 N.E.2d 458 .

1983Purdy v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 282 , 369 N.E.2d 633 ; Williams v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 430 , 381 N.E.2d 458 .

11983–1983
Ortiz v. State green
ind · 1976
2 sentences

1978Ind. Code § 34-1-21-6 (Bums 1973) provides: *677 See Ortiz v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 549 , 356 N.E.2d 1188 .

1978Ind. Code § 34-1-21-6 (Bums 1973) provides: *677 See Ortiz v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 549 , 356 N.E.2d 1188 .

11978–1978
Caywood v. State green
indctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1975Caywood v. State (1974), 160 Ind. App. 346 , 311 N.E.2d 845, 847 ; Jones v. State, supra. ISSUE 3: Beacham contends that the court’s failure to grant a mistrial after a witness for the prosecution made certain statements in the presence of the jury is reversible error.

1975Caywood v. State (1974), 160 Ind. App. 346 , 311 N.E.2d 845, 847 ; Jones v. State, supra. ISSUE 3: Beacham contends that the court’s failure to grant a mistrial after a witness for the prosecution made certain statements in the presence of the jury is reversible error.

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

NM 17 (2005–2025) GA 10 (1916–2023) CA 8 (1965–2023) TX 8 (1922–2004) IL 8 (2003–2014) FL 7 (1969–2012) MO 7 (1928–2017) IN 7 (1975–2002) IA 3 (1974–2001) TN 3 (1997–2001) MN 2 (1985–2006) SC 2 (1931–1985) AR 2 (1963–1989) AZ 2 (1979–2020) AL 2 (1967–1973) WA 2 (1986–2019) ID 2 (1998–2004) MS 2 (1983–2024) MI 2 (1955–1971)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check