mere assertion defense (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

mere assertion defense in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Tapia v. Stategreen
ind · 2001 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Tapia, 753 N.E.2d at 587 . [18] Banks argues that trial counsel relinquished Banks’ right to a fair trial and caused an “effective” plea of guilty to twelve counts of forgery by stipulating to some of the requisite elements.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Wilson v. State green
indctapp · 1993
2 sentences

1999“A mere assertion of error, absent evidence of prejudice, will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Id.

1994Id.

21994–1999
Isom v. State green
indctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1993Isom v. State (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 1347, 1350 .

11993–1993
Sulie v. State green
ind · 1988
1 sentence

1992Sulie, supra. PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES OF BLACK JURORS The prosecutor used peremptory challenges to remove the only two black jurors from the panel of prospective jurors.

11992–1992
Boothe v. State green
indctapp · 1982
1 sentence

1986A mere assertion by the test operator that the department guidelines were followed will not correct this problem, and such an assertion was found insufficient by itself in Boothe v. State (1982), Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 708 .

11986–1986
Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Goldberg green
ca7 · 1944
2 sentences

1970Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Goldberg, 143 F. 2d 752 (7th Cir. 1944) cert. den. 323 U. S. 770 .

1970Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Goldberg, 143 F.2d 752 (7th Cir.1944) cert. den. 323 U.S. 770 .

11970–1970
Harper v. Terry neutral
ind · 1880
1 sentence

1970Brake v. Payne, supra; Scherer v. Ingerman, supra; Harper v. Terry, 70 Ind. 264 (1880), 7 Ind. Dec. at 40. * * * Although the defense of laches may often involve factual issues, the mere assertion of this defense and a change in circumstances without a sufficient allegation of how plaintiffs' delay caused prejudice to the defendants within the meaning of the laches doctrine under state law will not preclude summary judgment.

11970–1970
Thornton v. City of Portland green
scotus · 1944
2 sentences

1970Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Goldberg, 143 F. 2d 752 (7th Cir. 1944) cert. den. 323 U. S. 770 .

1970Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Goldberg, 143 F.2d 752 (7th Cir.1944) cert. den. 323 U.S. 770 .

11970–1970

Where else courts name it

OK 11 (1972–1987) NY 10 (1932–1997) PA 9 (1926–2015) IN 7 (1970–2015) NM 7 (1933–2023) AL 6 (1916–1986) CO 6 (1975–2013) CT 4 (1890–1993) IL 3 (1974–1982) VT 3 (1920–2001) MI 3 (1891–1989) CA 3 (1946–1993) TN 2 (2010–2016) WA 2 (1948–2020) FL 2 (1960–1994) WV 2 (1992–2023) TX 2 (1959–1982) OH 2 (1993–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check