unemployment compensation claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

unemployment compensation claim in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Frederick v. REV. BD. OF INDIANA EMPL. SEC. DIV.green
indctapp · 1983 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind. App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind.App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Whirlpool Corp. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division green
indctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind. App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind.App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

21988–1988
Ryba v. REVIEW BD. OF INDIANA, ETC. green
indctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind. App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind. App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

1988See Frederick v. Review Bd. (1983), Ind.App., 448 N.E.2d 1230 -31, trans. denied; Ryba v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 435 N.E.2d 78 , 81; Whirlpool v. Review Bd. (1982), Ind.App., 438 N.E.2d 775, 779 .

21988–1988
Paoloco v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1973
2 sentences

1982Bd. of Rev., (1973) 10 Pa.Cmwlth. 214 , 309 A.2d 594 , 1 has held that due process does not “require that the referee tender such advice” at the unemployment compensation hearing.

1982Bd. of Rev., (1973) 10 Pa.Cmwlth. 214 , 309 A.2d 594 , 1 has held that due process does not “require that the referee tender such advice” at the unemployment compensation hearing.

21982–1982
Carter v. REV. BD. OF IND. DEPT. OF EMPLOY. green
indctapp · 1988
1 sentence

2014Bd. of Ind. Dep’t of Emp’t and Training Servs., 526 N.E.2d 717 , 719 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988): Generally, the evidentiary hearing conducted before a referee affords the parties to an unemployment compensation claim due process of law and the review board on appeal is not constitutionally required to provide an additional evidentiary hearing.

12014–2014
Lucas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division neutral
indctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1987When a claimant appears without representation of counsel at an unemployment compensation hearing in Indiana, the referee is required to insure a complete presentation of the case. 640 I.A.C. 1-11-3; Lucas v. Review Board (1981), Ind.App., 416 N.E.2d 906 , 907 n. 5; DeWhirst v. Review Board (1981), Ind.App., 419 N.E.2d 150 , 151 n. 4.

11987–1987
Dewhirst v. REVIEW BD. OF IND. EMPLOYMENT SEC. green
indctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1987When a claimant appears without representation of counsel at an unemployment compensation hearing in Indiana, the referee is required to insure a complete presentation of the case. 640 I.A.C. 1-11-3; Lucas v. Review Board (1981), Ind.App., 416 N.E.2d 906 , 907 n. 5; DeWhirst v. Review Board (1981), Ind.App., 419 N.E.2d 150 , 151 n. 4.

11987–1987
Reece v. Review Board of the Employment Security Division green
indctapp · 1977
1 sentence

1982Div., (1977) 172 Inf App. 503, 360 N.E.2d 1262 , that the ten-day period defined in Ind. Code § 22-4-17-2 (e) (Burns 1974), which governed notices of appeals from a deputy’s determination of an unemployment compensation claim, did not begin to run until receipt of the deputy’s decision. 2 Likewise, in O’Donoghue v. Review Board of Ind. Emp.

11982–1982
O'Donoghue v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division green
indctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1982Div., (1980) Ind.App., 406 N.E.2d 1267 , the Court of Appeals held that the fifteen-day period defined in Ind. Code § 22-4-17-3 (Burns 1974), which governs notices of appeal from a referee’s resolution of an unemployment compensation claim, does not begin to run until actual notification of the decision.

11982–1982

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 22-4-17-2 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 22-4-17-3 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 22-4-17-6 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 22-4-1-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 32 (1981–2022) AL 8 (1979–2007) OH 7 (1961–2011) FL 7 (1988–2009) IN 7 (1982–2014) IL 6 (1992–2018) TN 6 (1990–2025) CO 5 (1982–1994) WA 5 (1998–2025) MO 4 (2014–2014) DC 3 (1972–2014) NY 3 (1983–1997) TX 3 (2001–2010) OR 2 (1986–1990) WV 2 (1996–2024) SC 2 (1995–1997) VA 2 (1990–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check