Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Dept. of Natural Resourcesgreen2 sentences2001In Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Department of Natural Resources, 496 So.2d 281, 286 (La.1986), this court, following the United States Supreme Court in Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 410-13 , 103 S.Ct. 697, 704-05 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 set out a four-step analysis in determining whether retroactive application of a law violates the contract clause. 1994Energy Reserves, 459 U.S. at 410-13 , 103 S.Ct. at 704-05 ; Board of Comm'rs, 496 So.2d at 292-93 . | 1 | 2 |
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Clubgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club, 05-1013 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/12/06) , 934 So.2d 945 (applying a four-step inquiry to resolve the conflicting results); State Farm Mut. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
green
2 sentences2001In Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Department of Natural Resources, 496 So.2d 281, 286 (La.1986), this court, following the United States Supreme Court in Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 410-13 , 103 S.Ct. 697, 704-05 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 set out a four-step analysis in determining whether retroactive application of a law violates the contract clause. 2001In Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Department of Natural Resources, 496 So.2d 281, 286 (La.1986), this court, following the United States Supreme Court in Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 410-13 , 103 S.Ct. 697, 704-05 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 set out a four-step analysis in determining whether retroactive application of a law violates the contract clause. | 4 | 1994–2006 |
Segura v. Frank
green
2 sentences2007Segura, 630 So.2d at 729 . 2006Segura, XXXX-XXXX p. 21, 630 So.2d at 729 ; Energy Reserves, 459 U.S. at 410-413 , 103 S.Ct. at 704-705 . | 3 | 2003–2007 |
Giroir v. SOUTH LA. MEDICAL CTR., ETC.
green
1 sentence2010IfiThe decision in Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 475 So.2d 1040 , (La.1985) allowed the relation back of an amended petition to allow the addition of the claims of children to that of their father, the original plaintiff in a wrongful death suit, and developed a four step analysis with respect to weighing whether an amended claim relates back to the filing of an original petition. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.