Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences1992See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); State v. Young, 551 So.2d at 700 ; State v. Williams, 524 So.2d at 747 . 1992See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); State v. Young, 551 So.2d at 700 ; State v. Williams, 524 So.2d at 747 . | 1 | 1 |
Magee v. Jefferson Rentalgreen1 sentence1985See for comparison Magee v. Jefferson *502 Rental, 454 So.2d 842 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2016According to the record presently before this court, trial counsel failed to interview a number of witnesses who could support the defendant’s claim that another individual, Elbert Ratcliff, not relator, was actually the shooter. 1 With no witnesses to support that claim, trial counsel presented no evidence in the guilt phase, instead offering a purely argumentative defense and cross-examining some of the state’s witnesses. |gThe standard for effective assistance of counsel was set forth in the seminal case: Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2016According to the record presently before this court, trial counsel failed to interview a number of witnesses who could support the defendant’s claim that another individual, Elbert Ratcliff, not relator, was actually the shooter. 1 With no witnesses to support that claim, trial counsel presented no evidence in the guilt phase, instead offering a purely argumentative defense and cross-examining some of the state’s witnesses. |gThe standard for effective assistance of counsel was set forth in the seminal case: Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Dorignac
green
1 sentence2014Addressing a similar situation, in Dorignac, 747 So.2d 1110 , the supreme court found a discrepancy as to whether the defense requested a continuance warranted a remand for an evidentiary hearing. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Manning
green
1 sentence2006Referring to the recently enacted La.Code Crim Proc. art. 905.5.1, we stated in a footnote that "in a significant departure from the procedures the Court established in Williams , the new legislation calls for the jury to make the determination of whether a defendant is exempt from capital punishment by reason of mental retardation." Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Jacobs
green
1 sentence2001Rejecting that argument, the trial judge stated that he did not find a prima facie case supporting the objection and noted on the record that "he had been `satisfied on each of the [three] challenges that there was a racially neutral reason based upon the record and answers from the prospective jurors during voir dire examination.'" Jacobs , 99-0991 ( on reh'g ) at p. 1, 803 So.2d at 958 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence1992See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); State v. Young, 551 So.2d at 700 ; State v. Williams, 524 So.2d at 747 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Young
green
1 sentence1992See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); State v. Young, 551 So.2d at 700 ; State v. Williams, 524 So.2d at 747 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Fleishmann v. Fleishmann
green
1 sentence1990This child support case is again before us on appeal, following a remand for an evidentiary hearing we ordered on the previous appeal, Fleishmann v. Fleishmann, 538 So.2d 306 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Lambert v. Kelley
green
1 sentence1985Appellant relies on Lambert v. Kelley, 270 So.2d 532 (La. 1972) but does not present facts which would support that result or that may support a remand for an evidentiary hearing. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.