7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughygreen2 sentences2015See McConnaughy, 228 Md. at 13 , 179 A.2d at 123 (“The cooperation clause is included ... so that the insurance company will not be prejudiced in investigation and defense at trial. 2015See McConnaughy, 228 Md. at 13 , 179 A.2d at 123 (“The cooperation clause is included ... so that the insurance company will not be prejudiced in investigation and defense at trial. | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Indemnity Ins. Co. of NA v. Smith
green
2 sentences2000Co. of N.A. v. Smith, 197 Md. 160, 164 , 78 A.2d 461 (1951). 1962Co. of N. A. v. Smith, 197 Md. 160 , cited above, it was held that the insured had wilfully violated the cooperation clause by disappearing and staying hidden. | 2 | 1962–2000 |
Brohawn v. Transamerica Insurance
green
2 sentences1995Where an insurance company claims lack of coverage due to the insured’s failure to comply with a contract provision, such as a cooperation clause, however, a declaratory judgment action is “ordinarily ... appropriate and should be granted.” Brohawn, 276 Md. at 405 , 347 A.2d 842 . 1995Where an insurance company claims lack of coverage due to the insured’s failure to comply with a contract provision, such as a cooperation clause, however, a declaratory judgment action is “ordinarily ... appropriate and should be granted.” Brohawn, 276 Md. at 405 , 347 A.2d 842 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. Miller
green
1 sentence1994Soc’y v. Miller, 52 Md.App. 602 , 451 A.2d 980 (1982), where the Court of Special Appeals affirmed a finding in a declaratory judgment action that the insurer was estopped to disclaim coverage based on the insured’s breach of the cooperation clause. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Gregorio
green
1 sentence1994Soc’y v. Miller, 52 Md.App. 602 , 451 A.2d 980 (1982), where the Court of Special Appeals affirmed a finding in a declaratory judgment action that the insurer was estopped to disclaim coverage based on the insured’s breach of the cooperation clause. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.