pro rata clause (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

pro rata clause in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1966–1993 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporationgreen
ca6 · 1959 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra ; American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F.2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N.J. 554 , 147 A.2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F.2d 189, 192-93 (6th Cir.1960), reviewing the authorities.

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra; American Surety Co. of N. Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F. 2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N. J. 554, 147 A. 2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F. 2d 189, 192-93 ( 6th Cir. 1960), reviewing the authorities.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Consol. Ins. Co. v. Bankers Ins. Co. green
md · 1966
2 sentences

1993Id. at 399 , 223 A.2d at 598 .

1971“Three general types of ‘other insurance’ clauses commonly appear in modern automobile liability policies: (1) the escape clause, whereby the policy is declared not to cover the insured in a double coverage situation; (2) the excess clause, whereby the insurer declares itself liable up to the limits of its policy only for the excess amount, if any, necessary to indemnify the insured after the other insurer has paid to the full limit of its coverage; (3) the pro-rata clause, whereby the insurer obligates itself for a ratable share of the loss in the same proportion which the limit of its own po

31970–1993
American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-Appellant green
ca4 · 1958
2 sentences

1970Consolidated Insurance Co. v. Bankers Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania, 244 Md. 392 (1966); American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F. 2d 934 (4th Cir. 1958).

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra; American Surety Co. of N. Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F. 2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N. J. 554, 147 A. 2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F. 2d 189, 192-93 ( 6th Cir. 1960), reviewing the authorities.

31966–1970
McFarland v. Chicago Exp., Inc. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Employers' Ins. Co. Of Boston, Mass green
ca7 · 1952
2 sentences

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra ; American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F.2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N.J. 554 , 147 A.2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F.2d 189, 192-93 (6th Cir.1960), reviewing the authorities.

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra; American Surety Co. of N. Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F. 2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N. J. 554, 147 A. 2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F. 2d 189, 192-93 ( 6th Cir. 1960), reviewing the authorities.

21966–1966
Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co. green
nj · 1959
2 sentences

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra ; American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F.2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N.J. 554 , 147 A.2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F.2d 189, 192-93 (6th Cir.1960), reviewing the authorities.

1966McFarland v. Chicago Express, supra; American Surety Co. of N. Y. v. Canal Insurance Co., 258 F. 2d 934 (4th Cir., 1958) and cases cited therein; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 28 N. J. 554, 147 A. 2d 529 (1959); Citizens Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 273 F. 2d 189, 192-93 ( 6th Cir. 1960), reviewing the authorities.

21966–1966
National Indemnity Co. v. Continental Insurance green
mdctspecapp · 1985
2 sentences

1992Nat’l Indemnity, 61 Md.App. at 578 , 487 A.2d 1191 {citing 8A Appleman § 4907.65 at 345).

1992Nat’l Indemnity, 61 Md.App. at 578 , 487 A.2d 1191 {citing 8A Appleman § 4907.65 at 345).

11992–1992
Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. Citizens Casualty Co. green
md · 1950
1 sentence

1978That is the rule adopted by this court in fire insurance cases, based not upon the nature of the insurance, but upon the contract which the companies made.” Celina Mutual v. Citizens Casualty, 194 Md. 236, 243 .

11978–1978
Continental Cas. Co. v. Weekes green
fla · 1954
1 sentence

1971See Couch on Insurance 2d, Section 45:182 at p. 233: “[T]he so-called ‘automatic insurance’ clauses generally read as follows: ‘Automatic Insurance For Newly Acquired Automobiles.’ If the. named Insured who is the owner of the automobile acquires ownership of another automobile, such insurance as is afforded by this policy applies also to such other automobile as of the date of its delivery to him, subject to the following additional conditions: (1) if the Company insures all automobiles owned by the named Insured at the date of such delivery, insurance applies to such other automobile, if it

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

LA 13 (1967–2018) MI 12 (1922–2022) NJ 12 (1959–2018) TX 11 (1925–2023) IA 10 (1928–1993) IL 10 (1911–2007) CA 8 (1956–2003) MD 7 (1966–1993) MN 6 (1917–1994) NY 6 (1937–2025) WA 6 (1965–2011) OK 5 (1928–1996) WI 4 (1968–2020) SC 4 (1973–2013) PA 4 (1932–1953) MO 4 (1923–2011) RI 4 (1992–2012) TN 3 (1915–1996) IN 3 (1991–2007) KS 3 (1981–2005) FL 3 (1963–2010) GA 3 (1917–1964) DC 2 (1981–1999) MA 2 (1988–2015) DE 2 (1995–2014) AR 2 (1913–1939) CO 2 (1972–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check