7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.green2 sentences2018The Court concluded that public records carry a "presumption of reliability" and that the public records exception "appropriately allows the reception of reliable facts[.]" Id. at 612 , 495 A.2d 348 . 2018The Court concluded that public records carry a "presumption of reliability" and that the public records exception "appropriately allows the reception of reliable facts[.]" Id. at 612 , 495 A.2d 348 . | 2 | 6 |
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstronggreen2 sentences2006See Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 112-13 , 604 A.2d 47, 49 (1992) (holding that a trial judge “has the discretion to exclude a document that meets the technical requirements of a business record when the objecting party persuades the judge that the document lacks the degree of reliability and trustworthiness that business records are ordinarily assumed to possess.”) (footnote omitted); Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 303 Md. 581, 604-605 , 495 A.2d 348, 360 (1985) (applying the public records exception to the hearsay rule and differentiating between “fact” and “opinion”); 2006See Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 112-13 , 604 A.2d 47, 49 (1992) (holding that a trial judge “has the discretion to exclude a document that meets the technical requirements of a business record when the objecting party persuades the judge that the document lacks the degree of reliability and trustworthiness that business records are ordinarily assumed to possess.”) (footnote omitted); Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc., 303 Md. 581, 604-605 , 495 A.2d 348, 360 (1985) (applying the public records exception to the hearsay rule and differentiating between “fact” and “opinion”); | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ali v. State
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 305 , 550 A.2d 925 . 2013Id. at 305 , 550 A.2d 925 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.