6 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bakergreen2 sentences2018See State v. Baker, 842 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tenn. 1992) (holding that certified Department of Safety driving records are admissible evidence under the public records exception to the hearsay rule). 2000Moreover, although the public records exception does not even require that the record be introduced through the testimony of a “custodian or other qualified witness,” State v. Baker, 842 S.W.2d 261, 264-65 (Tenn. Crim. | 4 | 4 |
State v. Ruckergreen1 sentence2014The admissibility of certain types of documents under Rule 803(6) “does not mean that every entry contained in the documents can be admitted into evidence.” State v. Rucker, 847 S.W.2d 512, 516 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Cary Brown
green
1 sentence1999Brown, 9 F.3d at 911-12 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Oscar Ramos Quezada
green
2 sentences1999Quezada, 754 F.2d at 1194-95 . 1999Id. 1194 , 1193 & n.9. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Frank Grady and John Jankowski
green
1 sentence1999Grady, 544 F.2d at 604 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.