public records exception (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

public records exception in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando Velasquezgreen
ca2 · 1993 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22
Jolivet v. Immigration & Naturalization Servicegreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22
Van Sickle v. McGinnisgreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22
State v. Davisgreen
tenn · 2004 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

12
State v. Sharpegreen
nc · 1996 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026See Sharpe, 344 N.C. at 194 , 473 S.E.2d at 5 (citation omitted).

2026See Sharpe, 344 N.C. at 194 , 473 S.E.2d at 5 (citation omitted).

11
Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.green
ncctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026Furthermore, even if the report itself falls within the public records exception, “any hearsay contained in the report must also fall under one of the hearsay exceptions.” See Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc., 96 N.C.

2026App. 443, 446 , 386 S.E.2d 76, 77 (1989) (citation omitted).

11
State v. Fortegreen
nc · 2006 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008As a result, we must determine whether these reports are admissible under Rule 803(8) before we can decide whether they are admissible as business records.” State v. Forte, 360 N.C. 427, 436 , 629 S.E.2d 137, 144 (2006) (citation omitted).

2008As a result, we must determine whether these reports are admissible under Rule 803(8) before we can decide whether they are admissible as business records.” State v. Forte, 360 N.C. 427, 436 , 629 S.E.2d 137, 144 (2006) (citation omitted).

11
United States v. Frank Grady and John Jankowskigreen
ca2 · 1976 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 604 (2d Cir.1976).

2006United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 604 (2d Cir. 1976).

11
State v. Woodygreen
ncctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006App. 576, 578 , 402 S.E.2d 848, 850 (1991) (“[Receiving the civil part of the revocation order into evidence to show that defendant’s driver’s license was revoked and he knew it was authorized by the public records exception to the hearsay rule.”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Plonka v. Brown neutral
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22007–2007
Ash v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County neutral
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22007–2007
McKeithan v. Lavan, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas green
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315, 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600, 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

2007See, e.g., United States v. Rosa, 11 F.3d 315 , 333 (2d Cir.1993) (New York City medical examiner's written autopsy report is admissible as public record under Fed.R.Evid. 803(8)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1042 , 114 S.Ct. 1565 , 128 L.Ed.2d 211 (1994); State v. Davis, 141 S.W.3d 600 , 630 (Tenn.2004) ("The autopsy reports are admissible hearsay under Rules 803(6) and 803(8) of the Tennessee Rules of Evidence."), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S.Ct. 1306 , 161 L.Ed.2d 123 (2005); Tex. Workers' Comp.

22007–2007
United States v. William Weiland green
ca9 · 2005
1 sentence

2006We agree “that ‘the sources of the information or other circumstances’ in this case do not ‘indicate lack of trustworthiness.’ ” Id. at 1075 (quoting Fed.

12006–2006

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 119 (1957–2025) OH 65 (1991–2026) TX 43 (1983–2026) FL 42 (1971–2025) IN 21 (1982–2024) CA 20 (1994–2026) WA 18 (1984–2026) PA 18 (1971–2025) IL 16 (1978–2024) NM 15 (1995–2020) MI 11 (1992–2025) AZ 11 (1989–2022) WI 10 (1998–2025) NJ 10 (2002–2024) MA 8 (1985–2025) AK 8 (1988–2025) DC 7 (1991–2009) MD 7 (1990–2018) TN 6 (1999–2018) NC 6 (2006–2026) ID 6 (1990–2026) OR 6 (1992–2025) HI 5 (1996–2019) ME 5 (1984–2022) NV 5 (2014–2017) GA 5 (1998–2016) MS 4 (2003–2021) IA 4 (1982–2025) SD 4 (2004–2026) OK 4 (1936–2014) CO 4 (1987–2015) VA 3 (2003–2019) SC 3 (2008–2014) NY 3 (2007–2010) CT 2 (1970–1997) UT 2 (1987–2017) AL 2 (2000–2000) VT 2 (2000–2026) NE 2 (1938–2013) ND 2 (2009–2013) WV 2 (1999–2002) MN 2 (1984–2024) DE 2 (1986–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check