Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1948–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver
green
2 sentences1970Assuming, without deciding, that it is applicable and broader than the doctrine of recrimination (Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver, 182 Md. 624, 627 , 35 A. 2d 810 ), we think the rule could not be applied under the facts of this case.” Id. at 704 . 1970Assuming, without deciding, that it is applicable and broader than the doctrine of recrimination (Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver, 182 Md. 624, 627 , 35 A. 2d 810 ), we think the rule could not be applied under the facts of this case.” Id. at 704 . | 2 | 1948–1970 |
Sami v. Sami
green
2 sentences1998That doctrine was well surveyed by Judge Powers for this Court in Sami v. Sami, 29 Md.App. 161, 167-75 , 347 A.2d 888 (1975). 1998That doctrine was well surveyed by Judge Powers for this Court in Sami v. Sami, 29 Md.App. 161, 167-75 , 347 A.2d 888 (1975). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Matakieff v. Matakieff
green
2 sentences1975In Matakieff v. Matakieff, 246 Md. 23 , 226 A. 2d 887 (1967), the wife sued for divorce alleging desertion by the husband. 1975In Matakieff v. Matakieff, 246 Md. 23 , 226 A. 2d 887 (1967), the wife sued for divorce alleging desertion by the husband. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Courson v. Courson
green
2 sentences1972Courson v. Courson, 213 Md. 183 , 129 A. 2d 917; Stenger v. Stenger, 14 Md. 1972Courson v. Courson, 213 Md. 183 , 129 A. 2d 917; Stenger v. Stenger, 14 Md. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Stenger v. Stenger
neutral
1 sentence1972Courson v. Courson, 213 Md. 183 , 129 A. 2d 917; Stenger v. Stenger, 14 Md. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Space Aero Products Co. v. R. E. Darling Co.
green
2 sentences1970In Space Aero v. Darling, 238 Md. 93 , 208 A. 2d 74 (1965), Judge Oppenheimer said for the Court : “The clean hands doctrine is one resting in the sound discretion of the court; it is applied, not for the protection of the parties, but for the court’s own protection. 1970In Space Aero v. Darling, 238 Md. 93 , 208 A. 2d 74 (1965), Judge Oppenheimer said for the Court : “The clean hands doctrine is one resting in the sound discretion of the court; it is applied, not for the protection of the parties, but for the court’s own protection. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Sackman v. Sackman
green
2 sentences1969The doctrine of recrimination can only be applied where there is “proof of a marital offense that would constitute a ground for divorce.” Sackman v. Sackman, 236 Md. 237, 240 , 203 A. 2d 903 (1964). 1969The doctrine of recrimination can only be applied where there is “proof of a marital offense that would constitute a ground for divorce.” Sackman v. Sackman, 236 Md. 237, 240 , 203 A. 2d 903 (1964). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Matysek v. Matysek
green
1 sentence1957How-ever, when our decision in Matysek v. Matysek, 212 Md. 44 , holding that recrimination is not a defense in a suit for divorce on the ground of voluntary separation, was handed down a few days later, the Chancellor granted a petition for rehearing. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.