Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Whittington v. Whittingtongreen1 sentence2020Whittington, supra, 172 Md. App. at 336-37 (footnote omitted). 17 A trial court’s determination of whether an unconscionable disparity exists is a finding of fact, which we review applying the clearly erroneous standard of review. | 1 | 1 |
Doser v. Dosergreen2 sentences2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). 2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tracey v. Tracey
green
2 sentences2020These exceptions are a “restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony” that exist to “protect the spouse who is less financially secure from too harsh a life once single again.” Tracey, supra, 328 Md. at 392 , 614 A.2d 590 . 2020These exceptions are a “restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony” that exist to “protect the spouse who is less financially secure from too harsh a life once single again.” Tracey, supra, 328 Md. at 392 , 614 A.2d 590 . | 5 | 1994–2020 |
Blaine v. Blaine
green
2 sentences2010As we explained in Blaine , FL Section 11-106 includes “provisions for indefinite alimony [which] serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony....” Blaine, 336 Md. at 70 , 646 A.2d at 423 . 2010As we explained in Blaine , FL Section 11-106 includes “provisions for indefinite alimony [which] serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony....” Blaine, 336 Md. at 70 , 646 A.2d at 423 . | 3 | 1999–2010 |
Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky
green
2 sentences2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). 2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.