Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doser v. Dosergreen2 sentences2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). 2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Cohngreen2 sentences1995In re Garber, 95 N.J. 597 , 472 A.2d 566, 572 (1984); In re Cohn, 46 N.J. 202 , 216 A.2d 1, 7 (1966). 1995In re Garber, 95 N.J. 597 , 472 A.2d 566, 572 (1984); In re Cohn, 46 N.J. 202 , 216 A.2d 1, 7 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Garbergreen2 sentences1995In re Garber, 95 N.J. 597 , 472 A.2d 566, 572 (1984); In re Cohn, 46 N.J. 202 , 216 A.2d 1, 7 (1966). 1995In re Garber, 95 N.J. 597 , 472 A.2d 566, 572 (1984); In re Cohn, 46 N.J. 202 , 216 A.2d 1, 7 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blaine v. Blaine
green
2 sentences2010As we explained in Blaine , FL Section 11-106 includes “provisions for indefinite alimony [which] serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony....” Blaine, 336 Md. at 70 , 646 A.2d at 423 . 2010As we explained in Blaine , FL Section 11-106 includes “provisions for indefinite alimony [which] serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony....” Blaine, 336 Md. at 70 , 646 A.2d at 423 . | 3 | 1999–2010 |
Tracey v. Tracey
green
2 sentences2000The provisions of § ll-106(c) serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony; they exist to *228 protect the spouse who is less financially secure from too harsh a life once single again. 328 Md. at 391-92 , 614 A.2d 590 (citations omitted; emphasis supplied). 2000The provisions of § ll-106(c) serve as a restraint upon the doctrine of rehabilitative alimony; they exist to *228 protect the spouse who is less financially secure from too harsh a life once single again. 328 Md. at 391-92 , 614 A.2d 590 (citations omitted; emphasis supplied). | 3 | 1994–2000 |
Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky
green
2 sentences2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). 2000See also Doser v. Doser, 106 Md.App. 329, 352-53 , 664 A.2d 453 (1995); Roginsky v. Blake-Roginsky, 129 Md.App. 132, 141-43 , 740 A.2d 125 (1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson
green
2 sentences1958The Court specifically rested its opinion on a violation of the immunities guaranteed by the First Amendment; and in the recent case of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama, 357 U. S. 449 , 78 S. Ct. 1163, 1171 , the Supreme Court stated, “In the domain of these indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press or association, the decisions of this Court recognize that abridgement of such rights, even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of governmental action.” (Emphasis added.) A reading of the cases cited by the appellant on the point u 1958The Court specifically rested its opinion on a violation of the immunities guaranteed by the First Amendment; and in the recent case of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama, 357 U. S. 449 , 78 S. Ct. 1163, 1171 , the Supreme Court stated, “In the domain of these indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press or association, the decisions of this Court recognize that abridgement of such rights, even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of governmental action.” (Emphasis added.) A reading of the cases cited by the appellant on the point u | 1 | 1958–1958 |