magnitude error (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

magnitude error in Michigan

7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People of Michigan v. Joshua Lee Thorpegreen
mich · 2019 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023The magnitude of this error, as described by our Supreme Court, mandates a finding of prejudice—that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different but for defense counsel’s decision to elicit testimony from Dr. Brown vouching for the 7 Thorpe, 504 Mich at 262. -10- credibility of the children.

11
People v. Sabingreen
michctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See Sabin, 242 Mich App at 659 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Batson v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2005Batson, supra at 99 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ; Purkett, supra at 768 , 115 S.Ct. 1769 .

2005Batson, supra at 99 ; Purkett, supra at 768 .

22005–2005
Purkett v. Elem green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2005Batson, supra at 99 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ; Purkett, supra at 768 , 115 S.Ct. 1769 .

2005Batson, supra at 99 ; Purkett, supra at 768 .

22005–2005
People v. Trakhtenberg green
mich · 2012
1 sentence

2020Id.

12020–2020
State v. Vreen yellow
wash · 2001
1 sentence

2005Therefore, no 9 See State v Vreen, 143 Wash 2d 923; 26 P3d 236 (2001), People v Lefebre, 5 P3d 295 (Colo, 2000). 17 device exists with which to plumb the magnitude of the error.

12005–2005
People v. Lefebre red
colo · 2000
1 sentence

2005Therefore, no 9 See State v Vreen, 143 Wash 2d 923; 26 P3d 236 (2001), People v Lefebre, 5 P3d 295 (Colo, 2000). 17 device exists with which to plumb the magnitude of the error.

12005–2005
United States v. Leon green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2003The rule thus operates as “a judicially created remedy designed to safeguard Fourth Amendment rights generally through its deterrent effect, rather than a personal constitutional right of the party aggrieved.” . . . . [United States v Leon, 468 US 897, 906 ; 104 S Ct 3407 ; 82 L Ed 2d 677 (1984).] Irrespective of the application of the exclusionary rule in the context of a constitutional violation, the drastic remedy of exclusion of evidence does not necessarily apply to a statutory violation.9 Whether the exclusionary rule should 9 The exclusionary rule is particularly harsh in that it is nei

2003The rule thus operates as “a judicially created remedy designed to safeguard Fourth Amendment rights generally through its deterrent effect, rather than a personal constitutional right of the party aggrieved.” . . . . [United States v Leon, 468 US 897, 906 ; 104 S Ct 3407 ; 82 L Ed 2d 677 (1984).] Irrespective of the application of the exclusionary rule in the context of a constitutional violation, the drastic remedy of exclusion of evidence does not necessarily apply to a statutory violation.9 Whether the exclusionary rule should 9 The exclusionary rule is particularly harsh in that it is nei

12003–2003
People v. Goldston neutral
mich · 2003
1 sentence

2003We note that leave has recently been granted in People v. Goldston, 467 Mich. 938 , 655 N.W.2d 232 (2003), in which this Court will consider whether to adopt and apply a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. [9] The exclusionary rule is particularly harsh in that it is neither narrowly tailored nor discerning of the magnitude of the error it is intended to deter.

12003–2003
People v. Parney green
michctapp · 1977
1 sentence

1978Accordingly, we find the present case distinguishable from Parney, supra, to the extent that the admission of the social worker’s testimony was harmless error.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

IL 31 (1973–2026) NJ 28 (1992–2026) TX 27 (1995–2026) TN 23 (2007–2026) LA 14 (1978–2026) CA 8 (2017–2024) MI 7 (1978–2023) GA 5 (1976–2019) OH 4 (1969–2002) OR 3 (1994–2021) WA 3 (1953–2020) KS 3 (2001–2008) NY 3 (1985–2026) MA 3 (1990–2025) MO 2 (1986–1987) ND 2 (2024–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check