Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harvey v. Harveygreen1 sentence2014See Harvey, 237 Mich App at 437 (“Because the present controversy is a continuation of the parties’ original divorce action, and not a separate lawsuit, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable here.”). | 1 | 1 |
Spada v. Pauleygreen2 sentences1998In light of this Court’s decision in Spada v Pauley, 149 Mich App 196, 199, n 1, 204-205 ; 385 NW2d 746 (1986), we find that the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable here for several reasons. 1998In light of this Court’s decision in Spada v Pauley, 149 Mich App 196, 199, n 1, 204-205 ; 385 NW2d 746 (1986), we find that the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable here for several reasons. | 1 | 1 |
Attorney General Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. Lapeer Farmers Mutual Fire Ins.green2 sentences1994See Attorney General ex rel Comm'r of Ins v Lapeer Farmers Mutual Fire Ins Ass'n, 297 Mich 174 ; 297 NW 232 (1941). 1994See Attorney General ex rel Comm'r of Ins v Lapeer Farmers Mutual Fire Ins Ass'n, 297 Mich 174 ; 297 NW 232 (1941). | 1 | 1 |
Pike v. City of Wyominggreen1 sentence1994See, generally, Pike, supra at 600-602 ; Riley v Northland Geriatric Center (After Remand), 431 Mich 632, 640 ; 433 NW2d 787 (1988) (opinion of GRIFFIN, J.) (recognizing that an employee's future rate of worker's compensation benefits is subject to change, triggered by factors other than the physical condition of the employee). [6] See also Riley , n 5 supra at 653 (opinion of BOYLE, J.) ("there was no final judgment in Moore [ v Detroit Bd of Ed (After Remand), a companion case to Riley ] and therefore the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable"). [7] Although we hold today that the order a | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
York v. Wayne County Sheriff
green
2 sentences2002Citing York v Wayne Co Sheriff, 157 Mich App 417, 424-425 ; 403 NW2d 152 (1987), defendant further argues that the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable where *332 one action is brought in a party’s representative capacity and another, subsequent action is brought in a party’s individual right. 2002Citing York v Wayne Co Sheriff, 157 Mich App 417, 424-425 ; 403 NW2d 152 (1987), defendant further argues that the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable where *332 one action is brought in a party’s representative capacity and another, subsequent action is brought in a party’s individual right. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Riley v. Northland Geriatric Center
green
2 sentences1994See, generally, Pike, supra at 600-602 ; Riley v Northland Geriatric Center (After Remand), 431 Mich 632, 640 ; 433 NW2d 787 (1988) (opinion of GRIFFIN, J.) (recognizing that an employee's future rate of worker's compensation benefits is subject to change, triggered by factors other than the physical condition of the employee). [6] See also Riley , n 5 supra at 653 (opinion of BOYLE, J.) ("there was no final judgment in Moore [ v Detroit Bd of Ed (After Remand), a companion case to Riley ] and therefore the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable"). [7] Although we hold today that the order a 1994See, generally, Pike, supra at 600-602 ; Riley v Northland Geriatric Center (After Remand), 431 Mich 632, 640 ; 433 NW2d 787 (1988) (opinion of GRIFFIN, J.) (recognizing that an employee's future rate of worker's compensation benefits is subject to change, triggered by factors other than the physical condition of the employee). [6] See also Riley , n 5 supra at 653 (opinion of BOYLE, J.) ("there was no final judgment in Moore [ v Detroit Bd of Ed (After Remand), a companion case to Riley ] and therefore the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable"). [7] Although we hold today that the order a | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Cohen v. Home Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1988See 1 Restatement Judgments, 2d, § 24(1), p 196; Cohen v Home Life Ins Co, 273 Mich 469, 473 ; 263 NW 857 (1935). 1988See 1 Restatement Judgments, 2d, § 24(1), p 196; Cohen v Home Life Ins Co, 273 Mich 469, 473 ; 263 NW 857 (1935). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Mich. Mut. Liab. Co.
green
2 sentences1980American Mutual Liabil *227 ity Ins Co v Michgian Mutual Liability Co, 64 Mich App 315 , 324-325; 235 NW2d 769 ; 91 ALR3d 1159 (1975). 1980American Mutual Liabil *227 ity Ins Co v Michgian Mutual Liability Co, 64 Mich App 315 , 324-325; 235 NW2d 769 ; 91 ALR3d 1159 (1975). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Giegling v. Helmbold
green
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Reid v. Gooden
neutral
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Gumienny v. Hess
green
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Bankers Trust Co. v. Forsyth
green
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Tucker v. Rohrback
green
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Sovereign v. Sovereign
green
2 sentences1967There being no identity of the parties,, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . 1967There being no identity of the parties, the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable. 170 ALR 1181 ; Tucker v. Rohrback (1864), 13 Mich 73 ; Bankers Trust Company of Muskegon v. Forsyth (1934), 266 Mich 517 ; Reid v. Gooden (1937), 282 Mich 495 ; Gumienny v. Hess (1938), 285 Mich 411 ; Sovereign v. Sovereign (1958), 354 Mich 150, 154 ; Giegling v. Helmbold (1959), 357 Mich 462, 465 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.