Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2022–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. W. T. Grant Co.green2 sentences2023This, together with a public interest in having the legality of the practices settled, -2- militates against a mootness conclusion.” [Ed Subscription Serv, Inc v American Ed Servs, Inc, 115 Mich App 413, 430 ; 320 NW2d 684 (1982), quoting United States v W T Grant Co, 345 US 629, 632 ; 73 S Ct 894 ; 97 L Ed 1303 (1953).] Under the voluntary cessation doctrine, “[t]he case may nevertheless be moot if the defendant can demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation that the wrong will be repeated.” W T Grant Co, 345 US at 633 (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2023This, together with a public interest in having the legality of the practices settled, -2- militates against a mootness conclusion.” [Ed Subscription Serv, Inc v American Ed Servs, Inc, 115 Mich App 413, 430 ; 320 NW2d 684 (1982), quoting United States v W T Grant Co, 345 US 629, 632 ; 73 S Ct 894 ; 97 L Ed 1303 (1953).] Under the voluntary cessation doctrine, “[t]he case may nevertheless be moot if the defendant can demonstrate that there is no reasonable expectation that the wrong will be repeated.” W T Grant Co, 345 US at 633 (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 3 | 4 |
Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth Hertelgreen1 sentence2025Id. at 595. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Educational Subscription Service, Inc v. American Educational Services, Inc
green
2 sentences2025This, together with a public interest in having the legality of the practices settled, militates against a mootness conclusion. [Educational Subscription Serv, Inc v Am Educational Servs, Inc, 115 Mich App 413, 430 ; 320 NW2d 684 (1982) (cleaned up).] -3- However, the voluntary-cessation exception has not yet been adopted in Michigan in a binding opinion. 2025This, together with a public interest in having the legality of the practices settled, militates against a mootness conclusion. [Educational Subscription Serv, Inc v Am Educational Servs, Inc, 115 Mich App 413, 430 ; 320 NW2d 684 (1982) (cleaned up).] -3- However, the voluntary-cessation exception has not yet been adopted in Michigan in a binding opinion. | 4 | 2023–2025 |
United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
green
2 sentences2022A narrow exception to the voluntary cessation doctrine provides that a case is moot when “subsequent events made it absolutely clear that the allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur.” United States v Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass’n, 393 US 199, 203 ; 89 S Ct 361 ; 21 L Ed 2d 344 (1968). 2022A narrow exception to the voluntary cessation doctrine provides that a case is moot when “subsequent events made it absolutely clear that the allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur.” United States v Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass’n, 393 US 199, 203 ; 89 S Ct 361 ; 21 L Ed 2d 344 (1968). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.