Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Joon Kyu Kimgreen2 sentences1994The supreme court discussed the Webber test and its application in State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544, 550 (Minn.1987). 1994The supreme court discussed the Webber test and its application in State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544, 550 (Minn.1987). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Leegreen2 sentences1987In a number of its opinions the court of appeals has stated that “[t]here is no Minnesota Supreme Court case where the state has proved the ‘critical impact’ strand of the Webber test.” See, e.g., State v. Lee, 376 N.W.2d 259, 261-62 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). 1987In a number of its opinions the court of appeals has stated that “[t]here is no Minnesota Supreme Court case where the state has proved the ‘critical impact’ strand of the Webber test.” See, e.g., State v. Lee, 376 N.W.2d 259, 261-62 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Pelovskygreen2 sentences1987The fact is that before the establishment of the court of appeals, we frequently reviewed state’s appeals from pretrial suppression orders and in reviewing such cases we made a preliminary determination that the state had met the critical impact test. 9 Had we not made such a preliminary determination, we would not have decided those appeals but would have dismissed them. 10 The court of appeals has also stated, in several cases, that in order to show critical impact the state must show that the remaining evidence is “so weak that all possibility of conviction has been destroyed”— see, e.g., L 1987The fact is that before the establishment of the court of appeals, we frequently reviewed state’s appeals from pretrial suppression orders and in reviewing such cases we made a preliminary determination that the state had met the critical impact test. 9 Had we not made such a preliminary determination, we would not have decided those appeals but would have dismissed them. 10 The court of appeals has also stated, in several cases, that in order to show critical impact the state must show that the remaining evidence is “so weak that all possibility of conviction has been destroyed”— see, e.g., L | 1 | 2 |
Paidar v. Hughesgreen1 sentence2024To the contrary, one social worker stated that she planned to provide Webber with a Tennessen warning, but that “he would not interview with [her].” Therefore, we determine that Webber’s claim for exemplary damages does not survive summary judgment. 5 question of law when “different minds can reasonably arrive only at one result.” Paidar v. Hughes, 615 N.W.2d 276, 281 (Minn. 2000). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bouwmangreen2 sentences1991In State v. Bouwman, 328 N.W.2d 703, 706 (Minn.1982), the supreme court, rejecting the doctrine of diminished responsibility, held that psychiatric evidence on the defendant’s mental capacity is inadmissible on the issue of intent. 1991In State v. Bouwman, 328 N.W.2d 703, 706 (Minn.1982), the supreme court, rejecting the doctrine of diminished responsibility, held that psychiatric evidence on the defendant’s mental capacity is inadmissible on the issue of intent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boyd
green
2 sentences1987The court of appeals held that the state did not meet this burden and concluded that the trial court had properly interpreted and applied the rule of our decision in Boyd, supra, to suppress the statistical population frequency evidence. 1987The court of appeals held that the state did not meet this burden and concluded that the trial court had properly interpreted and applied the rule of our decision in Boyd, supra, to suppress the statistical population frequency evidence. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Helenbolt
green
2 sentences1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). 1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Fisher
neutral
2 sentences1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). 1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Minnesota v. Helenbolt
green
2 sentences1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). 1984State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn.1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035 , 100 S.Ct. 709 , 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.