Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1892–1943 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roman v. King
green
2 sentences1943Roman v. King, 289 Mo. 641 , 233 S.W. 161 , 25 A.L.R. 1263 ; Kratz v. Kinney (Mo. App.), 41 S.W.2d 954 ; Brewer v. Silverstein (Mo.), 64 S.W.2d 289 . 1943Roman v. King, 289 Mo. 641 , 233 S.W. 161 , 25 A.L.R. 1263 ; Kratz v. Kinney (Mo. App.), 41 S.W.2d 954 ; Brewer v. Silverstein (Mo.), 64 S.W.2d 289 . | 1 | 1943–1943 |
State v. Daniels
neutral
1 sentence1925This has always been the rule in both civil and criminal cases. [In re Drainage District v. Richardson, 227 Mo. 252 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 184 Mo. 632 ; State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 ; In the Matter of Whitson’s Estate, 89 Mo. 58 ; State v. Daniels, 66 Mo. 192 .] If the filing in a criminal case of a proper application for a change of venue in due time operates in and of itself to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction, except to grant the change, and such application be overruled, then defendant may without further ado bide his time and if the ensuing* trial results in his convic | 1 | 1925–1925 |
In re the Estate of Whitson
green
1 sentence1925This has always been the rule in both civil and criminal cases. [In re Drainage District v. Richardson, 227 Mo. 252 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 184 Mo. 632 ; State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 ; In the Matter of Whitson’s Estate, 89 Mo. 58 ; State v. Daniels, 66 Mo. 192 .] If the filing in a criminal case of a proper application for a change of venue in due time operates in and of itself to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction, except to grant the change, and such application be overruled, then defendant may without further ado bide his time and if the ensuing* trial results in his convic | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State v. Dusenberry
green
1 sentence1925This has always been the rule in both civil and criminal cases. [In re Drainage District v. Richardson, 227 Mo. 252 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 184 Mo. 632 ; State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 ; In the Matter of Whitson’s Estate, 89 Mo. 58 ; State v. Daniels, 66 Mo. 192 .] If the filing in a criminal case of a proper application for a change of venue in due time operates in and of itself to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction, except to grant the change, and such application be overruled, then defendant may without further ado bide his time and if the ensuing* trial results in his convic | 1 | 1925–1925 |
State ex rel. Brady v. Evans
green
1 sentence1925This has always been the rule in both civil and criminal cases. [In re Drainage District v. Richardson, 227 Mo. 252 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 184 Mo. 632 ; State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 ; In the Matter of Whitson’s Estate, 89 Mo. 58 ; State v. Daniels, 66 Mo. 192 .] If the filing in a criminal case of a proper application for a change of venue in due time operates in and of itself to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction, except to grant the change, and such application be overruled, then defendant may without further ado bide his time and if the ensuing* trial results in his convic | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Inc. of Little Tarkio Drainage District No. 1 v. Richardson
neutral
1 sentence1925This has always been the rule in both civil and criminal cases. [In re Drainage District v. Richardson, 227 Mo. 252 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 184 Mo. 632 ; State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 ; In the Matter of Whitson’s Estate, 89 Mo. 58 ; State v. Daniels, 66 Mo. 192 .] If the filing in a criminal case of a proper application for a change of venue in due time operates in and of itself to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction, except to grant the change, and such application be overruled, then defendant may without further ado bide his time and if the ensuing* trial results in his convic | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Riddick v. Walsh
green
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Schultz v. Pacific Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. Jackson v. Emerson
neutral
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. Missouri Mutual Life Insurance v. King
neutral
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Connor v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. R.
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
City of St. Louis v. Lane
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. Aull v. Field
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Gracy
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. McCurdy v. Slover
neutral
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Bryant v. Russell
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Ross v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern
green
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Andrew County ex rel. Kirtley v. Schell
neutral
1 sentence1901Louis v. Lane, 110 Mo. 254 ; Railroad v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472 ; Bryant v. Russell, 127 Mo. 422 ; Conner v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 285 ; State ex rel. v. Field, 112 Mo. 554 ; Andrew Co. ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 ; Schultz v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 13 ; Ross v. Railroad, 111 Mo. 18 ; Carson-Rand Co. v. Stern, 129 Mo. 381 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. Crow v. Hostetter
neutral
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Robinson v. Dundee Land & Investment Co.
neutral
1 sentence1901Robinson v. Land Co., 80 Mo. App. 621 ; Howes v. Davis, 4 Abb. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Riddick & M'Nair v. Governor of Territory of Missouri
neutral
1 sentence1901This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Riddick v. Governor, 1 Mo. 147 ; State ex rel. v. Emerson, 39 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; Riddick v. Walsh, 15 Mo. 519 ; Ex parte Marmaduke, 91 Mo. 1 . c. 254; State ex rel. v. Hostetter, 137 Mo. 636 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 126 Mo. 652 ; St. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Howes v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1901Robinson v. Land Co., 80 Mo. App. 621 ; Howes v. Davis, 4 Abb. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State v. Marshall
neutral
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Brady v. Connelly
neutral
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
McCoy v. Farmer
neutral
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Green v. Walker
green
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Baker v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
City of St. Louis v. Brooks
neutral
2 sentences1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. 1900Louis v. Brooks, supra.] III. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Johnson v. Strader
neutral
1 sentence1900Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380 .] This has always been the rule in Missouri. [Johnson v. Strader, 3 Mo. 355 ; State v. Marshall, 36 Mo. 400 ; Brady v. Connelly, 52 Mo. 19 ; McCoy v. Farmer, 65 Mo. 244 ; Green v. Walker, 99 Mo. 68 ; Baker v. Railroad, 107 Mo. 230 ; St. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
| Richardson v. Harrison green | 1 | 1894–1894 |
| Fairbanks v. Long neutral | 1 | 1894–1894 |
| State v. Spain neutral | 1 | 1892–1892 |
| State v. Greenhagen neutral | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.