Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1885–1935 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kampman v. Tarver
neutral
2 sentences1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . 1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Tex. 424 ; Selman v. Wolfe, 27 Tex. 72 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Tex. 218 , 9 S. W. 141 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Tex. 402 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Tex. 257 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Tex. 727 ; Bonner v. Hearne, 75 Tex. 252 , 12 S. W. 38 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 63 Tex. 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Tex. 497 , 29 S. W. 768 . | 2 | 1915–1915 |
Taylor v. Hall
green
2 sentences1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . 1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Tex. 424 ; Selman v. Wolfe, 27 Tex. 72 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Tex. 218 , 9 S. W. 141 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Tex. 402 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Tex. 257 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Tex. 727 ; Bonner v. Hearne, 75 Tex. 252 , 12 S. W. 38 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 63 Tex. 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Tex. 497 , 29 S. W. 768 . | 2 | 1915–1915 |
Bonner v. Hearne
green
2 sentences1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . 1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Tex. 424 ; Selman v. Wolfe, 27 Tex. 72 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Tex. 218 , 9 S. W. 141 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Tex. 402 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Tex. 257 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Tex. 727 ; Bonner v. Hearne, 75 Tex. 252 , 12 S. W. 38 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 63 Tex. 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Tex. 497 , 29 S. W. 768 . | 2 | 1915–1915 |
McElroy v. Carmichael
neutral
1 sentence1935The Supreme Court, as early as McElroy v. Carmichael, 6 Tex. 454 , and again in Houghton v. State, 41 Tex. 136 , and in all cases since that time, announces this as a rule, and has been universally followed from that day to this. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Houghton v. State
neutral
1 sentence1935The Supreme Court, as early as McElroy v. Carmichael, 6 Tex. 454 , and again in Houghton v. State, 41 Tex. 136 , and in all cases since that time, announces this as a rule, and has been universally followed from that day to this. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Gregg v. Cole
green
1 sentence1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Keenan v. Perry
green
1 sentence1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Selman v. Wolfe
green
1 sentence1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Scoby v. Sweatt
neutral
1 sentence1915Bryan v. Sundberg, 5 Texas, 417 ; Selman v. Wolf, 27 Texas, 68 ; Taylor v. Hall, 71 Texas, 213 ; Cannon v. Vaughan, 12 Texas, 400 ; Keenan v. Perry, 24 Texas, 253 ; Scoby v. Sweatt, 28 Texas, 713 ; Bonner v. Hearn, 75 Texas, 242 ; Duncan v. Taylor, 62 Texas, 649 ; Kampman v. Tarver, 87 Texas, 491 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Estes v. State
green
1 sentence1913In the case of Estes v. State, 38 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Young v. State
neutral
1 sentence1913This has always been the rule in this court, and was specifically enforced in the case of Young v. State, 45 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Dever v. State
green
1 sentence1913It has been contended that the opinion of this court in the case of Dever v. State, 37 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Bigham v. State
green
1 sentence1912Other cases so holding: Drummond v. State, 2 Texas, 156 ; Bigham v. State, 31 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Drummond v. Republic of Texas
neutral
1 sentence1912Other cases so holding: Drummond v. State, 2 Texas, 156 ; Bigham v. State, 31 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
State v. Morris
neutral
1 sentence1912(Morris v. State, 43 Texas, 372 .) However, if we did not consider the originals sent up, the printed matter on the letterhead, circular and card are copied in the statement of facts, but we hold that the trial court on its own motion or the application of either party, when it is deemed necessary, may order any original paper introduced in evidence sent to this court for our inspection. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Croomes v. State
green
1 sentence1911In Croomes v. State, 40 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Burrell v. State
green
1 sentence1885(Johnson v. Brown, 51 Texas, 65 ; Burrell v. The State, 18 Texas, 713 ; Dixon v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 271.) The court erred in refusing to allow the proposed testimony to sustain the impeached witness. | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Johnson v. Brown
green
1 sentence1885(Johnson v. Brown, 51 Texas, 65 ; Burrell v. The State, 18 Texas, 713 ; Dixon v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 271.) The court erred in refusing to allow the proposed testimony to sustain the impeached witness. | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.