Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Smithgreen2 sentences2004See In re Marriage of Heath (1995), 272 Mont. 522 , 901 P.2d 590 , and In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 212 Mont. 223 , 686 P.2d 912 . 2004See In re Marriage of Heath (1995), 272 Mont. 522 , 901 P.2d 590 , and In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 212 Mont. 223 , 686 P.2d 912 . | 1 | 1 |
Marriage of Heath v. Heathgreen2 sentences2004See In re Marriage of Heath (1995), 272 Mont. 522 , 901 P.2d 590 , and In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 212 Mont. 223 , 686 P.2d 912 . 2004See In re Marriage of Heath (1995), 272 Mont. 522 , 901 P.2d 590 , and In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 212 Mont. 223 , 686 P.2d 912 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lee v. Lee
green
2 sentences2005Cf. Grounds v. Coward, 2000 MT 128, ¶¶ 5-6 , 300 Mont. 1, ¶¶ 5-6 , 2 P.3d 822, ¶¶ 5-6 , discussing Lee v. Lee, 2000 MT 67 , 299 Mont. 78 , 996 P.2d 389 (In Lee the family law exception applied because the contempt judgment was accompanied by a money judgment due under a dissolution decree). ¶49 We conclude that the $750 judgment was within the District Court’s contempt jurisdiction pursuant to the motion for contempt, and that there was no abuse of discretion in imposing this sanction. 2005Cf. Grounds v. Coward, 2000 MT 128, ¶¶ 5-6 , 300 Mont. 1, ¶¶ 5-6 , 2 P.3d 822, ¶¶ 5-6 , discussing Lee v. Lee, 2000 MT 67 , 299 Mont. 78 , 996 P.2d 389 (In Lee the family law exception applied because the contempt judgment was accompanied by a money judgment due under a dissolution decree). ¶49 We conclude that the $750 judgment was within the District Court’s contempt jurisdiction pursuant to the motion for contempt, and that there was no abuse of discretion in imposing this sanction. | 6 | 2004–2022 |
Marriage of Marez and Marshall
green
2 sentences2018Marez v. Marshall, 2014 MT 333, ¶ 23 , 377 Mont. 304 , 340 P.3d 520 . ¶10 The District Court’s order that Hobart appeals from was not a default judgment. 2018Marez v. Marshall, 2014 MT 333, ¶ 23 , 377 Mont. 304 , 340 P.3d 520 . ¶10 The District Court’s order that Hobart appeals from was not a default judgment. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Marriage of Grounds v. Coward
green
2 sentences2005Cf. Grounds v. Coward, 2000 MT 128, ¶¶ 5-6 , 300 Mont. 1, ¶¶ 5-6 , 2 P.3d 822, ¶¶ 5-6 , discussing Lee v. Lee, 2000 MT 67 , 299 Mont. 78 , 996 P.2d 389 (In Lee the family law exception applied because the contempt judgment was accompanied by a money judgment due under a dissolution decree). ¶49 We conclude that the $750 judgment was within the District Court’s contempt jurisdiction pursuant to the motion for contempt, and that there was no abuse of discretion in imposing this sanction. 2005Cf. Grounds v. Coward, 2000 MT 128, ¶¶ 5-6 , 300 Mont. 1, ¶¶ 5-6 , 2 P.3d 822, ¶¶ 5-6 , discussing Lee v. Lee, 2000 MT 67 , 299 Mont. 78 , 996 P.2d 389 (In Lee the family law exception applied because the contempt judgment was accompanied by a money judgment due under a dissolution decree). ¶49 We conclude that the $750 judgment was within the District Court’s contempt jurisdiction pursuant to the motion for contempt, and that there was no abuse of discretion in imposing this sanction. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.