Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1902–1964 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. . Levy
green
2 sentences1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . 1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . | 5 | 1933–1935 |
State v. Coates
neutral
2 sentences1935S. v. Levy , 200 N.C. 586 , 158 S.E. 94 ; S. v. Mitchem , 188 N.C. 608 , 125 S.E. 190 ; S. v. Coates , 130 N.C. 701 , 41 S.E. 706 . 1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . | 5 | 1933–1935 |
State v. . Mitchem
green
2 sentences1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . 1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . | 5 | 1933–1935 |
Fuller v. Jenkins.
neutral
2 sentences1935S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . 1934S. v. Levy, 200 N. C., 586 , 158 S. E., 94 ; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608 , 125 S. E., 190 ; S. v. Coates, 130 N. C., 701 , 41 S. E., 706 . | 3 | 1933–1935 |
State v. . Moore
neutral
2 sentences1935In S. v. Moore, 204 N. C., 545 , 168 S. E., 842 , it is said: “It is well settled as the law of this State that when a bill of indictment has been returned by the grand jury as a true bill upon testimony, all of which was incompetent, or upon the testimony of witnesses all of whom were disqualified by statute or by some well-settled principle of law in force in this State, the indictment will be quashed on the motion of the defendant, made in apt time; but where some of the testimony was competent and some incompetent, or some of the witnesses were qualified and some disqualified, the court wi 1935In S. v. Moore, 204 N. C., 545 , 168 S. E., 842 , it is said: “It is well settled as the law of this State that when a bill of indictment has been returned by the grand jury as a true bill upon testimony, all of which was incompetent, or upon the testimony of witnesses all of whom were disqualified by statute or by some well-settled principle of law in force in this State, the indictment will be quashed on the motion of the defendant, made in apt time; but where some of the testimony was competent and some incompetent, or some of the witnesses were qualified and some disqualified, the court wi | 3 | 1934–1935 |
State v. . Choate
green
2 sentences1964S. v. Choate, 228 N.C. 491 , 46 S.E. 2d 476 . 1964S. v. Choate, 228 N.C. 491 , 46 S.E. 2d 476 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
State v. Tucker
neutral
1 sentence1902In State v. Tucker, 20 Iowa, 508 , it is held that the admission of incompetent testimony (the wife against the husband) by the grand jury (there being other and competent evidence) does not,warrant quashing the indictment. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.