Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2021 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Samson v. Californiagreen2 sentences2021See Samson, 547 U.S. at 848 , 126 S. Ct. at 2197 ; Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 652-53, 115 S. Ct. at 2390 . 2021See Samson, 547 U.S. at 848 , 126 S. Ct. at 2197 ; Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 652-53, 115 S. Ct. at 2390 . | 2 | 2 |
Vernonia School District 47J v. Actongreen2 sentences2021In assessing reasonable expectations of privacy, “[t]he Fourth Amendment does not protect all subjective expectations of privacy, but only those that society recognizes as ‘legitimate.’ What expectations are legitimate varies, of course, with context.” Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 654 , 115 S. Ct. at 2391 (citing and quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 337-38, 105 S. Ct. 733 , 740-41 (1985)). ¶ 15 By citing Samson and Vernonia in Grady I, the Supreme Court provided an instructive framework for conducting the reasonableness balancing test to determine whether imposing SBM on a limited categor 2021In assessing reasonable expectations of privacy, “[t]he Fourth Amendment does not protect all subjective expectations of privacy, but only those that society recognizes as ‘legitimate.’ What expectations are legitimate varies, of course, with context.” Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 654 , 115 S. Ct. at 2391 (citing and quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 337-38, 105 S. Ct. 733 , 740-41 (1985)). ¶ 15 By citing Samson and Vernonia in Grady I, the Supreme Court provided an instructive framework for conducting the reasonableness balancing test to determine whether imposing SBM on a limited categor | 2 | 2 |
American Alloy Steel, Inc. v. Armco, Inc.green1 sentence2003Additionally, in American Alloy Steel, Inc. v. Armco, Inc., 777 S.W.2d 173, 175-76 (Tex. App. 1989), the Texas Court of Appeals held that Texas common law indemnity cases in which there was no underlying tort, recognized an implied-in-fact right of indemnification when a surety or an agency relationship existed between the plaintiff and defendant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New Jersey v. T. L. O.
green
2 sentences2021In assessing reasonable expectations of privacy, “[t]he Fourth Amendment does not protect all subjective expectations of privacy, but only those that society recognizes as ‘legitimate.’ What expectations are legitimate varies, of course, with context.” Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 654 , 115 S. Ct. at 2391 (citing and quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 337-38, 105 S. Ct. 733 , 740-41 (1985)). ¶ 15 By citing Samson and Vernonia in Grady I, the Supreme Court provided an instructive framework for conducting the reasonableness balancing test to determine whether imposing SBM on a limited categor 2021In assessing reasonable expectations of privacy, “[t]he Fourth Amendment does not protect all subjective expectations of privacy, but only those that society recognizes as ‘legitimate.’ What expectations are legitimate varies, of course, with context.” Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 654 , 115 S. Ct. at 2391 (citing and quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 , 337-38, 105 S. Ct. 733 , 740-41 (1985)). ¶ 15 By citing Samson and Vernonia in Grady I, the Supreme Court provided an instructive framework for conducting the reasonableness balancing test to determine whether imposing SBM on a limited categor | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Stephens v. Covington
green
2 sentences2021Accordingly, the Court of Appeals held the trial court correctly granted the landlord’s motion for summary judgment because “[i]n the light most favorable to [the] plaintiff, the evidence fail[ed] to show that [the landlord] knew that [the dog] had dangerous propensities prior to his attack on [the] plaintiff.” Stephens, 232 N.C. App. at 501 , 754 S.E.2d at 256 . ¶ 15 The Court of Appeals’ decision in Stephens provides an instructive framework for the present analysis. 2021Accordingly, the Court of Appeals held the trial court correctly granted the landlord’s motion for summary judgment because “[i]n the light most favorable to [the] plaintiff, the evidence fail[ed] to show that [the landlord] knew that [the dog] had dangerous propensities prior to his attack on [the] plaintiff.” Stephens, 232 N.C. App. at 501 , 754 S.E.2d at 256 . ¶ 15 The Court of Appeals’ decision in Stephens provides an instructive framework for the present analysis. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Richard E. Melvin v. United States
green
1 sentence2007We find Melvin v. United States, 78 F.3d 327 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 963 , 117 S.Ct. 384 , 136 L.Ed.2d 301 (1996) to be an instructive analysis of felony firearm statutes. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Melvin v. United States
neutral
2 sentences2007We find Melvin v. United States, 78 F.3d 327 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 963 , 117 S.Ct. 384 , 136 L.Ed.2d 301 (1996) to be an instructive analysis of felony firearm statutes. 2007We find Melvin v. United States, 78 F.3d 327 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 963 , 117 S.Ct. 384 , 136 L.Ed.2d 301 (1996) to be an instructive analysis of felony firearm statutes. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
United States v. Edward Corbit Houle
green
1 sentence1983Stephenson v. United States, 429 U.S. 1064 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 781 , 97 S.Ct. 792 (1977); U.S. v. Houle, 603 F. 2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1979) and Steagald v. United States, supra. In reconciling the decisions of the various state and federal courts, LaFave has made the following instructive analysis: A “planned” arrest is one which is made after a criminal investigation has been fully completed at another location and the police made a deliberate decision to go to a certain place, either the arrestee’s home or some other premises where he is believed to be, in order to take him into custody. ... | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Stephenson v. United States
neutral
2 sentences1983Stephenson v. United States, 429 U.S. 1064 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 781 , 97 S.Ct. 792 (1977); U.S. v. Houle, 603 F. 2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1979) and Steagald v. United States, supra. In reconciling the decisions of the various state and federal courts, LaFave has made the following instructive analysis: A “planned” arrest is one which is made after a criminal investigation has been fully completed at another location and the police made a deliberate decision to go to a certain place, either the arrestee’s home or some other premises where he is believed to be, in order to take him into custody. ... 1983Stephenson v. United States, 429 U.S. 1064 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 781 , 97 S.Ct. 792 (1977); U.S. v. Houle, 603 F. 2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1979) and Steagald v. United States, supra. In reconciling the decisions of the various state and federal courts, LaFave has made the following instructive analysis: A “planned” arrest is one which is made after a criminal investigation has been fully completed at another location and the police made a deliberate decision to go to a certain place, either the arrestee’s home or some other premises where he is believed to be, in order to take him into custody. ... | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.