7 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Fraziergreen2 sentences2014For that reason, “establishing an accord and satisfaction . . . as a matter of law requires evidence that permits no reasonable inference to the contrary and that shows the ‘unequivocal’ intent of one party to make and the other party to accept a lesser payment in satisfaction . . . of a larger claim.” Moore v. Frazier, 63 N.C. 2003“Establishing an accord and satisfaction ... as a matter of law requires evidence that permits no reasonable inference to the contrary and that shows the ‘unequivocal’ intent of one party to make and the other party to accept a lesser payment in satisfaction ... of a larger claim.” Moore v. Frazier, 63 N.C. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Abshiregreen2 sentences2019This Court addressed SBM in State v. Bowditch , 364 N.C. 335 , 342, 700 S.E.2d 1 , 6 (2010), and determined that the legislature intended SBM to be "a nonpunitive, regulatory program." The Court looked to the legislature's purpose in placing SBM in the same chapter as the sex offender registration laws and concluded that SBM was one part of a larger framework involving the sex offender registration program, stating that the "legislative objective [was] to make the SBM program one part of a broader regulatory means of confronting the unique 'threat to public safety posed by the recidivist tende 2019This Court addressed SBM in State v. Bowditch , 364 N.C. 335 , 342, 700 S.E.2d 1 , 6 (2010), and determined that the legislature intended SBM to be "a nonpunitive, regulatory program." The Court looked to the legislature's purpose in placing SBM in the same chapter as the sex offender registration laws and concluded that SBM was one part of a larger framework involving the sex offender registration program, stating that the "legislative objective [was] to make the SBM program one part of a broader regulatory means of confronting the unique 'threat to public safety posed by the recidivist tende | 1 | 2 |
Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust Companygreen2 sentences2014App. 476, 478-79 , 305 S.E.2d 562, 564 (1983) (citing Allgood, 242 N.C. at 515 , 88 S.E.2d at 831 ). 2014App. 476, 478-79 , 305 S.E.2d 562, 564 (1983) (citing Allgood, 242 N.C. at 515 , 88 S.E.2d at 831 ). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bowditch
green
2 sentences2019This Court addressed SBM in State v. Bowditch , 364 N.C. 335 , 342, 700 S.E.2d 1 , 6 (2010), and determined that the legislature intended SBM to be "a nonpunitive, regulatory program." The Court looked to the legislature's purpose in placing SBM in the same chapter as the sex offender registration laws and concluded that SBM was one part of a larger framework involving the sex offender registration program, stating that the "legislative objective [was] to make the SBM program one part of a broader regulatory means of confronting the unique 'threat to public safety posed by the recidivist tende 2019This Court addressed SBM in State v. Bowditch , 364 N.C. 335 , 342, 700 S.E.2d 1 , 6 (2010), and determined that the legislature intended SBM to be "a nonpunitive, regulatory program." The Court looked to the legislature's purpose in placing SBM in the same chapter as the sex offender registration laws and concluded that SBM was one part of a larger framework involving the sex offender registration program, stating that the "legislative objective [was] to make the SBM program one part of a broader regulatory means of confronting the unique 'threat to public safety posed by the recidivist tende | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Cullen v. Valley Forge Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2017Co., 161 N.C. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.