Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schutte v. Schmittgreen2 sentences1966See Schutte v. Schmitt, 162 Neb. 162 , 75 N. W. 2d 656 . 1966See Schutte v. Schmitt, 162 Neb. 162 , 75 N. W. 2d 656 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Affholder v. State ex rel. McMullen
green
1 sentence2009VII, § 1 the Nebraska Supreme Court has said: "`What methods and what means should be adopted in order to furnish free instruction to the children of the state has been left by the constitution to the legislature.'" Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity and Adequacy (Coalition) v. Heineman, 273 Neb. 531 , 542 , 731 N.W.2d 164 , 173 (2007) (quoting Affolder v. State, 51 Neb. 91 , 93 , 70 N.W.544, 545 (1897)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity & Adequacy v. Heineman
green
2 sentences2009VII, § 1 the Nebraska Supreme Court has said: "`What methods and what means should be adopted in order to furnish free instruction to the children of the state has been left by the constitution to the legislature.'" Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity and Adequacy (Coalition) v. Heineman, 273 Neb. 531 , 542 , 731 N.W.2d 164 , 173 (2007) (quoting Affolder v. State, 51 Neb. 91 , 93 , 70 N.W.544, 545 (1897)). 2009VII, § 1 the Nebraska Supreme Court has said: "`What methods and what means should be adopted in order to furnish free instruction to the children of the state has been left by the constitution to the legislature.'" Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity and Adequacy (Coalition) v. Heineman, 273 Neb. 531 , 542 , 731 N.W.2d 164 , 173 (2007) (quoting Affolder v. State, 51 Neb. 91 , 93 , 70 N.W.544, 545 (1897)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Farrell v. School District No. 54, Lincoln County
green
1 sentence2002In Farrell, the Court stated, "Article VII, section 6, of this State's Constitution provides: `The legislature shall provide for the free instruction in the common schools of this State of all persons between the ages of five and twenty-one years.' This provision of the Constitution leaves all matters pertaining to schools and school districts . . . with the Legislature." Id. at 858 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Peterson v. Hancock
green
2 sentences2002Peterson v. Hancock, 155 Neb. 801 , 810 , 54 N.W.2d 85 (1952). 2002Peterson v. Hancock, 155 Neb. 801 , 810 , 54 N.W.2d 85 (1952). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lemon v. Kurtzman
red
2 sentences1974The majority opinion properly relies upon the three-pronged test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U. S. 602 , 91 S. Ct. 2105 , 29 L. 1974The majority opinion properly relies upon the three-pronged test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U. S. 602 , 91 S. Ct. 2105 , 29 L. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. 1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
City of Wahoo v. Dickinson
neutral
1 sentence1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State ex rel. Hammond v. Dimond
green
1 sentence1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
City of Hastings v. Hansen
neutral
1 sentence1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Bisenius v. City of Randolph
green
1 sentence1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Winkler v. City of Hastings
neutral
1 sentence1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Seward County Rural Fire Protection District v. County of Seward
green
2 sentences1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. 1953Among the decisions of this court which recognize this rule are: City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; State v. Dimond, 44 Neb. 154 ; City of Hastings v. Hansen, 44 Neb. 704 ; Bisenius v. City of Randolph, 82 Neb. 520 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Elliott v. Wille, on rehearing, 112 Neb. 86 .” Rowe v. Ray, supra. In Seward County Rural Fire Protection Dist. v. County of Seward, 156 Neb. 516 , 56 N. W. 2d 700 , we approved the following in this regard, from Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161 , 28 S. Ct. 40 , 52 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State ex rel. Ahern v. Walsh
neutral
1 sentence1910VIII of the constitution, provides that certain gifts, grants and devises, the interest arising on certain funds, rents from unsold school lands, “and such other means as the legislature may provide, shall be exclusively applied to the support and maintenance of common schools in each school district in the state.” In State v. Walsh, 31 Neb. 469 , we held that the word “means” as used in section 4, art. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
State ex rel. School District No. 1 of Waukesha v. Thayer
green
2 sentences1905Now, the question arises as to whether section 2, supra, of our statutes is to be narrowly and technically construed for the purpose of shutting the doors of the school houses in the faces of many of the little boys and girls of the city and turning them out into the streets and by-ways, to grow up in idleness and ignorance, or whether it shall be liberally and broadly interpreted in the spirit of the provisions of section 6, article VIII of our constitution, which says: “The legislature shall provide for the free instruction in the common schools of this state of all persons between the ages 1905Now, the question arises as to whether section 2, supra, of our statutes is to be narrowly and technically construed for the purpose of shutting the doors of the school houses in the faces of many of the little boys and girls of the city and turning them out into the streets and by-ways, to grow up in idleness and ignorance, or whether it shall be liberally and broadly interpreted in the spirit of the provisions of section 6, article VIII of our constitution, which says: “The legislature shall provide for the free instruction in the common schools of this state of all persons between the ages | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.