7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herrera v. Fleming Companies, Inc.green2 sentences2004We reversed the Court of Appeals’ Herrera decision, concluding that Heins had not “abrogatefd] the elements necessary to establish liability on the part of a possessor of land for injury caused to a lawful visitor by a condition on the land.” Herrera v. Fleming Cos., 265 Neb. 118, 122 , 655 N.W.2d 378, 382 (2003). 2004We reversed the Court of Appeals’ Herrera decision, concluding that Heins had not “abrogatefd] the elements necessary to establish liability on the part of a possessor of land for injury caused to a lawful visitor by a condition on the land.” Herrera v. Fleming Cos., 265 Neb. 118, 122 , 655 N.W.2d 378, 382 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Scott
green
2 sentences2026Scott v. Scott, 319 Neb. 877 , 25 N.W.3d 439 (2025). 2026Scott v. Scott, 319 Neb. 877 , 25 N.W.3d 439 (2025). | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Stava v. Stava
green
1 sentence2025Stat. § 43-2923 (Reissue 2016) of Nebraska’s Parenting Act sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in deter- mining the best interests of a child in regard to custody. 9 Such factors include the relationship of the minor child to each parent; the desires and wishes of the minor child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; cred- ible evidence of abuse inflicted on any family or household 6 Stava v. Stava, 318 Neb. 32 , 13 N.W.3d 184 (2024). 7 Brief for appellant at 19. 8 Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 , 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017). 9 See, e.g., Olson | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Donald v. Donald
green
2 sentences2025Stat. § 43-2923 (Reissue 2016) of Nebraska’s Parenting Act sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in deter- mining the best interests of a child in regard to custody. 9 Such factors include the relationship of the minor child to each parent; the desires and wishes of the minor child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; cred- ible evidence of abuse inflicted on any family or household 6 Stava v. Stava, 318 Neb. 32 , 13 N.W.3d 184 (2024). 7 Brief for appellant at 19. 8 Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 , 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017). 9 See, e.g., Olson 2025Stat. § 43-2923 (Reissue 2016) of Nebraska’s Parenting Act sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in deter- mining the best interests of a child in regard to custody. 9 Such factors include the relationship of the minor child to each parent; the desires and wishes of the minor child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; cred- ible evidence of abuse inflicted on any family or household 6 Stava v. Stava, 318 Neb. 32 , 13 N.W.3d 184 (2024). 7 Brief for appellant at 19. 8 Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 , 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017). 9 See, e.g., Olson | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Olson v. Olson
green
1 sentence2025Stat. § 43-2923 (Reissue 2016) of Nebraska’s Parenting Act sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in deter- mining the best interests of a child in regard to custody. 9 Such factors include the relationship of the minor child to each parent; the desires and wishes of the minor child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; cred- ible evidence of abuse inflicted on any family or household 6 Stava v. Stava, 318 Neb. 32 , 13 N.W.3d 184 (2024). 7 Brief for appellant at 19. 8 Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 , 892 N.W.2d 100 (2017). 9 See, e.g., Olson | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Vogel v. Vogel
green
2 sentences2022Vogel v. Vogel, 262 Neb. 1030 , 637 N.W.2d 611 (2002). 2022Vogel v. Vogel, 262 Neb. 1030 , 637 N.W.2d 611 (2002). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Fine v. Fine
green
2 sentences2004Fine v. Fine, supra. Section 42-364(2) sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in determining the best interests of a child in this regard, including “[t]he relationship of the minor child to each parent prior to the commencement of the action or any subsequent hearing; . . . [t]he desires and wishes of the minor child if of an age of comprehension regardless of chronological age, when *345 such desires and wishes are based on sound reasoning; . . . [t]he general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; and . . . [credible evidence of abuse inflicted on any 2004Fine v. Fine, supra. Section 42-364(2) sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered in determining the best interests of a child in this regard, including “[t]he relationship of the minor child to each parent prior to the commencement of the action or any subsequent hearing; . . . [t]he desires and wishes of the minor child if of an age of comprehension regardless of chronological age, when *345 such desires and wishes are based on sound reasoning; . . . [t]he general health, welfare, and social behavior of the minor child; and . . . [credible evidence of abuse inflicted on any | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Heyne v. Kucirek
green
2 sentences2001In addition to these statutory factors, we have explained that a court determines the nature and extent of visitation rights on a case-by-case basis and may consider many factors and circumstances in each individual case, such as the age and health of the child; the character of the noncustodial parent; the place where visitation rights will be exercised; the frequency and duration of visits; the emotional relationship between the visiting parent and the child; the likely effect of visitation on the child; the availability of the child for visitation; the likelihood of disrupting an establishe 2001In addition to these statutory factors, we have explained that a court determines the nature and extent of visitation rights on a case-by-case basis and may consider many factors and circumstances in each individual case, such as the age and health of the child; the character of the noncustodial parent; the place where visitation rights will be exercised; the frequency and duration of visits; the emotional relationship between the visiting parent and the child; the likely effect of visitation on the child; the availability of the child for visitation; the likelihood of disrupting an establishe | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.