Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Washburngreen1 sentence2021RCW 26.09.090 emphasizes “the justness of an award, not its method of calculation.” In re Marriage of Washburn, 101 Wn.2d 168, 182 (1984). 13 No. 36751-7-III cons. w/36810-6-III In re Marriage of Bartlett RCW 26.09.090(1) provides a nonexhaustive list of factors for the dissolution court to consider when awarding spousal maintenance: (a) The financial resources of the party seeking maintenance, including separate or community property apportioned to him or her, and his or her ability to meet his or her needs independently, including the extent to which a provision for support of a child living | 1 | 1 |
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF Insurancegreen2 sentences2016The Supreme Court in Mutual of Enumclaw noted that Washington courts have relied on many factors when evaluating prejudice from late notice, and provided a nonexhaustive list of these factors: [1] Were damages concrete or nebulous? [2] Was there a settlement or did a neutral decision maker calculate damages; what were the circumstances surrounding the settlement? [3] Did a reliable entity do a thorough investigation of the incident? [4] Could the insurer have eliminated liability if given timely notice? [5] Could the insurer have proceeded differently in the litigation? 21 No. 46654-6-II 164 W 2016Whether late notice prejudiced an insurer is a question of fact, which “will seldom be decided as a matter of law.” Id. at 427 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hampton
green
1 sentence2020In Hampton, the Washington State Supreme Court identified a nonexhaustive list of factors the trial court may consider in determining whether to grant a continuance to allow substitution of private counsel, including “whether the request came at a point sufficiently in advance of trial to permit the trial court to readily adjust its calendar,” whether the continuance would push the trial date past the speedy trial deadline, whether the defendant made the request as soon as he became aware of the need to retain new counsel, whether there was a rational basis to believe the defendant’s request w | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re the Marriage of Cota
green
2 sentences2015Once that threshold requirement is satisfied, the trial court must also consider the following nonexhaustive list of factors: Id. 2015“Also to be considered are the amount and type of support that the child would have been afforded if the parents had stayed together.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence2009Brown, 94 Wn.2d at 368 . ¶44 The trial court should exercise its discretion with reference to a nonexhaustive list of factors, including (1) who seeks the equitable relief; (2) is the person seeking the equitable relief also demanding trial of the issues to the jury; (3) are the main issues primarily legal or equitable in their nature; (4) do the equitable issues present complexities in the trial which will affect the orderly determination of such issues by a jury; (5) are the equitable and legal issues easily separable; (6) if the nature of the action is doubtful, a jury trial should be allow | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Scavenius v. Manchester Port District
green
1 sentence2009Scavenius v. Manchester Port Dist., 2 Wn. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Watson
green
2 sentences2006State v. Watson, 231 Neb. 507, 514-17 , 437 N.W.2d 142 (1989). ¶25 Had the State introduced more than simply the officer’s statement that the substance “appeared to be ‘rock cocaine,’ ” we could evaluate whether the officer based his visual identification of the items on more than conjecture. 2006State v. Watson, 231 Neb. 507, 514-17 , 437 N.W.2d 142 (1989). ¶25 Had the State introduced more than simply the officer’s statement that the substance “appeared to be ‘rock cocaine,’ ” we could evaluate whether the officer based his visual identification of the items on more than conjecture. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.