Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and Dispensarygreen2 sentences2025Hosp. & Dispensary, 79 N.J. 549, 569 (1979) (Pashman, J., concurring) (citing Bd. of Educ. of Bernards Twp. v. Bernards Twp. 2021City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] A-3654-18 28 However, "[t]he exhaustion doctrine is not an absolute." Garrow, 79 N.J. at 561 . | 1 | 2 |
Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)green1 sentence2026City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] On the other hand, "[t]he doctrine of primary jurisdiction is applicable when a case is properly filed in the Superior Court but the court declines original jurisdiction, referring specific issues to the appropriate administrative body." Est. of Kotsovska v. Liebman, 221 N.J. 568, 588 (2015) (quoting Magic Petroleum Corp. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 218 N.J. 390, 405 (2014)). | 1 | 1 |
Magic Petroleum Corporation v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (069083)green1 sentence2026City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] On the other hand, "[t]he doctrine of primary jurisdiction is applicable when a case is properly filed in the Superior Court but the court declines original jurisdiction, referring specific issues to the appropriate administrative body." Est. of Kotsovska v. Liebman, 221 N.J. 568, 588 (2015) (quoting Magic Petroleum Corp. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 218 N.J. 390, 405 (2014)). | 1 | 1 |
Abbott v. Burkegreen1 sentence2024City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] However, the Court has also held that "[t]he exhaustion doctrine is not an absolute." Abbott v. Burke, 100 N.J. 269, 298 (1985) (quoting Garrow v. Elizabeth Gen. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
CITY OF ATLANTIC v. Laezza
green
2 sentences2021A-0214-19 5 [Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576 , 588 (1975) (citation omitted).] As the motion judge implicitly recognized: the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies serves three primary goals: (1) the rule ensures that claims will be heard, as a preliminary matter, by a body possessing expertise in the area; (2) administrative exhaustion allows the parties to create a factual record necessary for meaningful appellate review; and (3) the agency decision may satisfy the parties and thus obviate resort to the courts. [Atlantic City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] While we ag 1994The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies serves three primary goals: (1) the rule ensures that claims will be heard, as a preliminary matter, by a body possessing expertise in the area; (2) administrative exhaustion allows the parties to create a factual record necessary for meaningful appellate review; and (3) the agency decision may satisfy the parties and thus obviate resort to the courts. [ City of Atlantic City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255, 265 , 403 A. 2d 465 (1979).] The first goal is particularly important where the ultimate decision rests upon the factual determinations lying w | 6 | 1994–2026 |
21st Century v. D'Alessandro
green
1 sentence2021City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] "It is axiomatic that the exhaustion of remedies requirement is neither jurisdictional nor absolute." 21st Century Amusements, 257 N.J. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford
green
1 sentence2021A-0214-19 5 [Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576 , 588 (1975) (citation omitted).] As the motion judge implicitly recognized: the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies serves three primary goals: (1) the rule ensures that claims will be heard, as a preliminary matter, by a body possessing expertise in the area; (2) administrative exhaustion allows the parties to create a factual record necessary for meaningful appellate review; and (3) the agency decision may satisfy the parties and thus obviate resort to the courts. [Atlantic City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255 , 265 (1979).] While we ag | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Bd. of Education Bernards Tp. v. Bernards Tp. Ed. Assn.
green
2 sentences2000Ed. Ass'n, 79 N.J. 311, 317 , 399 A. 2d 620 (1979). 2000Ed. Ass'n, 79 N.J. 311, 317 , 399 A. 2d 620 (1979). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Schulman v. Paterson Redevelopment Agency
green
2 sentences1994Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman, 78 N.J. 378, 387 , 396 A. 2d 573 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , 100 S.Ct. 210 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979). 1994Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman, 78 N.J. 378, 387 , 396 A. 2d 573 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , 100 S.Ct. 210 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman
green
2 sentences1994Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman, 78 N.J. 378, 387 , 396 A. 2d 573 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , 100 S.Ct. 210 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979). 1994Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman, 78 N.J. 378, 387 , 396 A. 2d 573 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , 100 S.Ct. 210 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979). | 1 | 1994–1994 |