7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.green2 sentences2006Next, the court should "`examine the facial vagueness challenge and, assuming the enactment implicates no constitutionally protected conduct, should uphold the challenge only if the enactment is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.'" Ibid. (quoting Hoffman Estates, supra, 455 U.S. at 494-95 , 102 S.Ct. at 1191 , 71 L.Ed. 2d at 369 ). 2006Next, the court should "`examine the facial vagueness challenge and, assuming the enactment implicates no constitutionally protected conduct, should uphold the challenge only if the enactment is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.'" Ibid. (quoting Hoffman Estates, supra, 455 U.S. at 494-95 , 102 S.Ct. at 1191 , 71 L.Ed. 2d at 369 ). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Camerongreen2 sentences2021To succeed on a facial vagueness challenge, the person challenging the law must show it is "impermissibly vague in all its applications." State v. Cameron, 100 N.J. 586, 594 (1985). 2010Id. at 594 , 498 A. 2d 1217 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Saunders
green
2 sentences2019When an overbreadth challenge is rejected, "[t]he court should then examine the facial vagueness challenge and, assuming the enactment implicates no constitutionally protected conduct, should uphold the challenge only if the enactment is impermissibly vague in all of its applications." *1141 Saunders , 302 N.J. 2019When an overbreadth challenge is rejected, "[t]he court should then examine the facial vagueness challenge and, assuming the enactment implicates no constitutionally protected conduct, should uphold the challenge only if the enactment is impermissibly vague in all of its applications." Saunders, 302 N.J. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Coalition of New Jersey Sportsmen, Inc. v. Whitman
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 670-73 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.