party making claim (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

party making claim in New Jersey

7 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Siligato v. Stategreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1993 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2013–2025
2 sentences

2025Court Rules, cmt. 4 on R. 4:9-3 (2012)); see also Siligato v. State, 268 N.J.

2013In Siligato, supra, 268 N.J.Super. at 28-29 , 632 A.2d 837 , the Appellate Division considered an error in the designation of the plaintiff.

12
Sandra Woytas v. Greenwood Tree Experts, Inc. (081720) (Morris County and Statewide)green
nj · 2019 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025To prevail on that claim, defendants had to prove four elements: [F]irst, that the parties entered into a contract containing certain terms; second, that [the party making the claim] did what the contract required [that party] to do; third, that [the other party] . . . did not do what the contract required [that party] to do, defined as a breach of the contract; and fourth, that [party's] . . . breach, or failure to do what the contract required, caused a loss to the [party making the claim]. [Woytas v. Greenwood Tree Experts, Inc., 237 N.J. 501, 512 (2019) (quoting Globe Motor Co. v. Igdalev,

11
Globe Motor Company v. Ilya Igdalev(074996)green
nj · 2016 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025To prevail on that claim, defendants had to prove four elements: [F]irst, that the parties entered into a contract containing certain terms; second, that [the party making the claim] did what the contract required [that party] to do; third, that [the other party] . . . did not do what the contract required [that party] to do, defined as a breach of the contract; and fourth, that [party's] . . . breach, or failure to do what the contract required, caused a loss to the [party making the claim]. [Woytas v. Greenwood Tree Experts, Inc., 237 N.J. 501, 512 (2019) (quoting Globe Motor Co. v. Igdalev,

11
Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholdersgreen
nj · 1959 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984Gangemi v. Berry, 25 N.J. 1, 10 (1957). [Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 388 (1959).] Furthermore, the burden of overcoming the presumptive validity of an act of the Legislature is placed upon the party making the challenge, Jamouneau v. Harner, 16 N.J. 500, 515 (1954), that is, the plaintiffs herein.

11
Gangemi v. Berrygreen
nj · 1957 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984Gangemi v. Berry, 25 N.J. 1, 10 (1957). [Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 388 (1959).] Furthermore, the burden of overcoming the presumptive validity of an act of the Legislature is placed upon the party making the challenge, Jamouneau v. Harner, 16 N.J. 500, 515 (1954), that is, the plaintiffs herein.

11
Jamouneau v. Harnergreen
nj · 1954 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984Gangemi v. Berry, 25 N.J. 1, 10 (1957). [Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 388 (1959).] Furthermore, the burden of overcoming the presumptive validity of an act of the Legislature is placed upon the party making the challenge, Jamouneau v. Harner, 16 N.J. 500, 515 (1954), that is, the plaintiffs herein.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp. green
nj · 1981
2 sentences

1989Commonwealth Coatings, Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. 393 U.S. 145 [ 89 S.Ct. 337 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 ] (1968). [ 86 N.J. at 189-190 , 430 A. 2d 214 ] The burden of showing impermissible bias on the part of an arbitrator is upon the party making that claim.

1989Commonwealth Coatings, Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. 393 U.S. 145 [ 89 S.Ct. 337 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 ] (1968). [ 86 N.J. at 189-190 , 430 A. 2d 214 ] The burden of showing impermissible bias on the part of an arbitrator is upon the party making that claim.

21989–1989
Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1989Commonwealth Coatings, Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. 393 U.S. 145 [ 89 S.Ct. 337 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 ] (1968). [ 86 N.J. at 189-190 , 430 A. 2d 214 ] The burden of showing impermissible bias on the part of an arbitrator is upon the party making that claim.

1989Commonwealth Coatings, Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. 393 U.S. 145 [ 89 S.Ct. 337 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 ] (1968). [ 86 N.J. at 189-190 , 430 A. 2d 214 ] The burden of showing impermissible bias on the part of an arbitrator is upon the party making that claim.

21989–1989
Carrino v. Novotny green
nj · 1979
1 sentence

2025"The Rule 'has also been applied to an amendment re- identifying the party making the claim provided all of the conditions of the rule are satisfied.'" Ibid. (quoting Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J.

12025–2025
Prime Accounting Department v. Township of Carney's Point green
nj · 2013
1 sentence

2023R. 4:9-1 “has also been applied to an amendment re-identifying the party making the claim provided all of the conditions of the rule are satisfied.” Ibid. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

12023–2023

Where else courts name it

KS 46 (1934–2025) NY 39 (1863–2025) IL 27 (1902–2026) AL 23 (1942–2010) CT 20 (1976–2003) OH 20 (2001–2025) IN 18 (1991–2020) TX 17 (1981–2024) CA 16 (1891–2016) MO 15 (1884–2017) LA 14 (1986–2025) VA 14 (1910–2018) NM 13 (1981–2024) MT 12 (1994–2022) AZ 11 (1981–2024) MA 10 (1914–2009) PA 10 (1911–2014) NC 10 (1928–2017) WA 9 (2000–2015) MI 7 (1912–2025) NJ 7 (1984–2025) FL 6 (1985–2019) AK 6 (1978–2017) NE 6 (1947–2019) WY 5 (1970–2021) IA 5 (1986–2023) OR 5 (1993–2020) WV 4 (1877–2004) RI 4 (1949–2007) WI 4 (1988–2025) GA 3 (1928–1947) TN 3 (1951–2001) MD 3 (1977–2002) KY 3 (1947–2013) ND 3 (1901–2007) VT 3 (1987–2017) ID 3 (1992–2016) NH 3 (1850–2020) UT 3 (1997–2019) AR 2 (1912–1989) MN 2 (2011–2013) MS 2 (2009–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check