Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
17 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Criton Corp. v. Highlands Insurance Co.green2 sentences2015Co., 809 S.W.2d 355, 358 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, writ denied) (“Even though no particular form of presentment is required, the party making the claim must allege in its pleadings that presentment was made and- that the party to which the presentment was made failed to tender performance.”) (emphasis added). 1995Criton Corp. v. Highlands Ins., 809 S.W.2d 355, 358 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, writ denied) (emphasis added). 9 Bingo faded to assert in its pleadings that presentment occurred. | 2 | 2 |
Maloney v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Maloney v. State, 294 S.W.3d 613, 629 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, 10 pet. ref'd). 2015Maloney v. State, 294 S.W.3d 613, 629 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, 10 pet. ref'd). | 2 | 2 |
Miller-El v. Cockrellgreen2 sentences2005Mil *657 ler-El, 537 U.S. at 339 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 ; Purkett, 514 U.S. at 767 , 115 S.Ct. 1769 . 2005Mil *657 ler-El, 537 U.S. at 339 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 ; Purkett, 514 U.S. at 767 , 115 S.Ct. 1769 . | 1 | 3 |
Schnell v. State Farmgreen1 sentence2024If an insurer is liable on a claim, and fails to comply with the Prompt Payment Act, “the insurer is liable to pay the party making the claim under the policy, in addition to the amount of the claim, interest on the amount of the claim at the rate of eighteen percent a year as damages, together with reasonable attorney’s fees.” Zhu, 543 S.W.3d at 436 ; see also Schnell v. State Farm Lloyds, 98 F.4th 150 , 159–60 (5th Cir. 2024) (determining that the plaintiffs had “presented evidence that payment of the . . . appraisal award was a delayed payment for that damage for which State Farm had alread | 1 | 1 |
Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'ngreen1 sentence2015Ass'n, 777 S.W.2d 378, 383 (Tex.1989) (recognizing that the doctrine of the last antecedent is merely an aid used to determine the meaning and intent of communications, and it is not applicable in every case). 5 Although section 95.002(1) specifies who may be damaged for purposes of Chapter 95, section 95.001(2) defines a “claimant” more broadly to mean “a party making a claim subject to this chapter.” TEX. | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Clark v. State, 929 S.W.2d 5, 8 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Jensen v. Jensengreen1 sentence2001Jensen v. Jensen , 665 S.W.2d 107, 110 (Tex. 1984); Vallone , 644 S.W.2d at 459 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2014Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 ; Williams, 937 S.W.2d at 485 . 2014Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 ; Williams, 937 S.W.2d at 485 . | 6 | 2004–2014 |
Purkett v. Elem
green
2 sentences2014Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 ; Williams, 937 S.W.2d at 485 . 2014Id.; Purkett, 514 U.S. at 767 . 3 In reviewing a ruling on a Batson challenge, we review the record in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the challenges. | 6 | 2004–2014 |
Zhu v. First Cmty. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2024If an insurer is liable on a claim, and fails to comply with the Prompt Payment Act, “the insurer is liable to pay the party making the claim under the policy, in addition to the amount of the claim, interest on the amount of the claim at the rate of eighteen percent a year as damages, together with reasonable attorney’s fees.” Zhu, 543 S.W.3d at 436 ; see also Schnell v. State Farm Lloyds, 98 F.4th 150 , 159–60 (5th Cir. 2024) (determining that the plaintiffs had “presented evidence that payment of the . . . appraisal award was a delayed payment for that damage for which State Farm had alread | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Castillo v. State
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Canine, Inc. v. Golla
green
1 sentence2015“The word ‘present’ has been defined to mean a demand or request for pay ment.” Canine, Inc. v. Golla, 380 S.W.3d 189 , -193 (Tex.App.-Dallas- 2012, pet. denied); Jim Howe Homes, Inc. v. Rogers, 818 S.W.2d 901 , 904 n. 3 (Tex.App.-Austin 1991, no writ) (“Apparently, the supreme court has construed [presentment] to mean simply a demand or request for payment. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Jim Howe Homes, Inc. v. Rogers
green
1 sentence2015“The word ‘present’ has been defined to mean a demand or request for pay ment.” Canine, Inc. v. Golla, 380 S.W.3d 189 , -193 (Tex.App.-Dallas- 2012, pet. denied); Jim Howe Homes, Inc. v. Rogers, 818 S.W.2d 901 , 904 n. 3 (Tex.App.-Austin 1991, no writ) (“Apparently, the supreme court has construed [presentment] to mean simply a demand or request for payment. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Vallone v. Vallone
green
1 sentence2001Jensen v. Jensen , 665 S.W.2d 107, 110 (Tex. 1984); Vallone , 644 S.W.2d at 459 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Nettles v. Del Lingco of Houston
green
1 sentence1991Nettles v. Del Lingco of Houston, 638 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1982, no writ). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Ward v. Scarborough
green
1 sentence1981Ward v. Scarborough, 236 S.W. at 437-8 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.