Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1884–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reynolds v. Brillgreen2 sentences2012In order to prevail on a claim of ownership by adverse possession, the party making such a claim “must establish by a preponderance of evidence that possession was: 1) hostile and under a claim of right; 2) actual; 3) open and notorious; 4) exclusive; and 5) continuous for a term often years.” Reynolds v. Brill, 302 S.W.3d 716, 718 (Mo.App.2010). 2012The continuous ten-year requirement can be satisfied by a claimant tacking “his or her possession to that of his or her predecessors in interest, so long as the claimant can prove that the predecessors in interest consistently met each element of adverse possession during the time to which the claimant wishes to tack” Id. | 1 | 1 |
Cornucopia, Inc. v. Wagmangreen1 sentence2012Cornucopia, Inc. v. Wagman, 710 S.W.2d 882, 888 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 814 v. Monseesgreen1 sentence2011Workers v. Monsees, 335 S.W.3d 105, 108 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Bonner v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchangegreen1 sentence2001Bonner v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, 899 S.W.2d 925, 928 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
MacHholz-parks v. Suddathgreen1 sentence1999Evans, 869 S.W.2d at 874 ; Machholz-Parks v. Suddath, 884 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Mo.App.1994); Cunningham, 889 S.W.2d at 866-67 ; Lohrmann, 657 S.W.2d at 377 ; Conduff, 968 S.W.2d at 203 . | 1 | 1 |
City Bank & Trust Co. of Moberly v. Thomasgreen1 sentence1998City Bank & Trust Co. of Moberly v. Thomas, 735 S.W.2d 121, 122 [4] (Mo.App.1987). | 1 | 1 |
Mueller v. Kaessmanngreen1 sentence1977“The doctrine of estoppel cannot be successfully invoked where everything is equally well known to both parties, or where, though ignorant of the true state of the title at the time of the occurrence of the act which is claimed as an estoppel, the party making such claim had the means of ascertaining the truth of the matter, by reference to the records.”' Mueller v. Kaessmann, 84 Mo. 318, 329 (1884). | 1 | 1 |
Rhoads v. Rhoadsgreen2 sentences1977See also Rhoads v. Rhoads, 342 Mo. 934 , 119 S.W.2d 247, 252 (1938); Land Clearance for Redevelopment Auth. v. Dunn, 416 S.W.2d 948, 951 [1, 2] (Mo.1967). 1977See also Rhoads v. Rhoads, 342 Mo. 934 , 119 S.W.2d 247, 252 (1938); Land Clearance for Redevelopment Auth. v. Dunn, 416 S.W.2d 948, 951 [1, 2] (Mo.1967). | 1 | 1 |
Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of Kansas City v. Dunngreen1 sentence1977See also Rhoads v. Rhoads, 342 Mo. 934 , 119 S.W.2d 247, 252 (1938); Land Clearance for Redevelopment Auth. v. Dunn, 416 S.W.2d 948, 951 [1, 2] (Mo.1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Wagner v. St. Louis County Port Authority
green
1 sentence2017The burden of establishing that a governmental entity’s stated public purpose is arbitrary and unreasonable rests with “the party making the claim.” Wagner, 604 S.W.2d at 597 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hostler v. Green Park Development Co.
green
1 sentence2011Accordingly, “[t]o support an action for trespass, the party making the claim must have the legal right to possession.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Lohrmann v. Carter
green
1 sentence1999Evans, 869 S.W.2d at 874 ; Machholz-Parks v. Suddath, 884 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Mo.App.1994); Cunningham, 889 S.W.2d at 866-67 ; Lohrmann, 657 S.W.2d at 377 ; Conduff, 968 S.W.2d at 203 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Meeker v. Grissum
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Cunningham v. Hughes
green
1 sentence1999Evans, 869 S.W.2d at 874 ; Machholz-Parks v. Suddath, 884 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Mo.App.1994); Cunningham, 889 S.W.2d at 866-67 ; Lohrmann, 657 S.W.2d at 377 ; Conduff, 968 S.W.2d at 203 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Evans v. Wittorff
green
1 sentence1999Evans, 869 S.W.2d at 874 ; Machholz-Parks v. Suddath, 884 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Mo.App.1994); Cunningham, 889 S.W.2d at 866-67 ; Lohrmann, 657 S.W.2d at 377 ; Conduff, 968 S.W.2d at 203 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Conduff v. Stone
green
1 sentence1999Evans, 869 S.W.2d at 874 ; Machholz-Parks v. Suddath, 884 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Mo.App.1994); Cunningham, 889 S.W.2d at 866-67 ; Lohrmann, 657 S.W.2d at 377 ; Conduff, 968 S.W.2d at 203 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Wilton Boat Club v. Hazell
green
1 sentence1991Wilton Boat Club v. Hazell, 502 S.W.2d 273 (Mo.1973); Hauber v. Gentry, 215 S.W.2d 754 (Mo.1948). . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Evans v. Hamling
green
1 sentence1987Evans v. Hamling, 637 S.W.2d 746 (Mo.App.1982). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Sovern
green
2 sentences1960State v. Sovern, 225 Mo. 580, 591 , 125 S.W. 769, 773 .” There are cases which use language so broad as to indicate that possibly both means of impeachment might be used. 1960State v. Sovern, 225 Mo. 580, 591 , 125 S.W. 769, 773 .” There are cases which use language so broad as to indicate that possibly both means of impeachment might be used. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. Perry
green
1 sentence1901Bacon on Benefit Societies, sec. 261; Ballou v. Gile, 50 Wis. 614 ; American L. of H. v. Perry, 140 Mass. 580 ; Elsey v. Odd Fellows, supra. The cases to .which plaintiff has called our attention, and which will be found cited in his brief, do not bear out his view. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Elsey v. Odd Fellows' Mutual Relief Ass'n
green
1 sentence1901Bacon on Benefit Societies, sec. 261; Ballou v. Gile, 50 Wis. 614 ; American L. of H. v. Perry, 140 Mass. 580 ; Elsey v. Odd Fellows, supra. The cases to .which plaintiff has called our attention, and which will be found cited in his brief, do not bear out his view. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Ballou v. Gile
neutral
1 sentence1901Bacon on Benefit Societies, sec. 261; Ballou v. Gile, 50 Wis. 614 ; American L. of H. v. Perry, 140 Mass. 580 ; Elsey v. Odd Fellows, supra. The cases to .which plaintiff has called our attention, and which will be found cited in his brief, do not bear out his view. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.
green
1 sentence1884Co., 3 Otto 326 . | 1 | 1884–1884 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.