Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Galassogreen2 sentences2016With respect to charge two, we decline to sustain the charge in its entirety inasmuch as the record reflects that respondent actively participated in the disciplinary process and responded to the Grievance Committee’s requests for information and documentation (see Matter of Galasso, 19 NY3d 688, 695-696 [2012]). 2016With respect to charge two, we decline to sustain the charge in its entirety inasmuch as the record reflects that respondent actively participated in the disciplinary process and responded to the Grievance Committee’s requests for information and documentation (see Matter of Galasso, 19 NY3d 688, 695-696 [2012]). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Wolfegreen1 sentence2022As for the appropriate sanction for this sustained misconduct, as respondent has continued to fail to cooperate with AGC's investigations despite his asserted recovery from his medical condition and participation in this proceeding, we deem it appropriate to confirm that suspension ( see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.9 [a] [3]; Matter of Wolfe , 185 AD3d 1347, 1348 [3d Dept 2020]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2020Brady vindicates "our system of the administration of justice" ( Brady v Maryland , 373 US at 87 ) . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re Brenner
neutral
1 sentence2007Specifically, it was alleged that in an affidavit submitted to the District Court for permission to appear pro hac vice in a criminal case, respondent falsely denied that he had ever been disciplined by a court before which he had been admitted when, in fact, he had been publicly censured by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1994 (.Matter of Brenner, 201 AD2d 100 [1994]), and formally admonished by this Court’s Disciplinary Committee in 1997. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
In re Edelman
neutral
1 sentence2002Contrary to respondent’s contentions that his fabricated story to the Police Department approximately 24 years ago did not hamper their official investigation into the underlying crime or prejudice its prosecution, its mere utterance constitutes prejudice to the administration of justice in violation of DR 1-102 (a) (5) (see, Matter of Edelman, 212 AD2d 126 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In re Gordon
green
1 sentence1999These sections and rules are analogous to DR 1-102 (A) (5) of the New York Code (22 NYCRR 1200.3), which provides that “[a] lawyer * * * shall not * * * [e]ngage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” Failure in New York to cooperate with a disciplinary or grievance committee has been deemed to be conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of this section (see, Matter of Levine, 207 AD2d 96, 97 ; Matter of Gordon, 142 AD2d 135, 137 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
In re Levine
neutral
1 sentence1999These sections and rules are analogous to DR 1-102 (A) (5) of the New York Code (22 NYCRR 1200.3), which provides that “[a] lawyer * * * shall not * * * [e]ngage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” Failure in New York to cooperate with a disciplinary or grievance committee has been deemed to be conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of this section (see, Matter of Levine, 207 AD2d 96, 97 ; Matter of Gordon, 142 AD2d 135, 137 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.