7 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1894–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Claytongreen1 sentence1994(CPL 170.40; see also, People v Clayton, supra.) In sum, the court concludes that the defendants have failed to sustain the burden of showing factors which would compel the dismissal of the accusatory instrument in the interest of justice. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mold Maintenance Service v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
green
1 sentence1981Corp., 56 AD2d 134, 135 ). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Koump v. Smith
green
1 sentence1981Full disclosure is the general rule and the burden of showing immunity from disclosure is on the party asserting it (Koump v Smith, 25 NY2d 287, 294 ; Mold Maintenance Serv. v General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People Ex Rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
green
1 sentence1947Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. Tax Comrs., 196 N. Y. 39 ; People ex rel. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Co. v. City of New York
green
1 sentence1947Co. v. City of New York, 214 N. Y. 1 .) This plaintiff-respondent has the burden of showing an error in the assessment (People ex rel. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
People Ex Rel. Chas. Kohlman & Co. v. Law
green
1 sentence1945Kohlman & Co. v. Law, 239 N. Y. 346, 350 .) Having failed in his returns to itemize the expenses he personally incurred and for which he claimed.deductions as “ Business expenses,” giving them only a general description at lump sum amounts, he had the burden of showing the error in the field audit revision. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Miles v. . Loomis
neutral
1 sentence1895In Miles v. Loomis, 75 N. Y. 288 , which arose before the statute of 1880, it was held that: “Where the instruments, the signatures to which are thus compared, were, for aught that appears in the case, offered in evidence for other purposes than comparison, and were received without objection, it cannot be objected upon appeal that they were immaterial for any other purpose, and so could not be used for comparison. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Boyd v. Fumonte
neutral
2 sentences1894The appellant’s burden of showing error in the determination of this question of fact (Boyd v. Fumonte, 4 Misc. 1894Rep. 604 , 24 N. Y. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Bosley v. National MacHine Co.
neutral
2 sentences1894McCabe v. Brayton, 38 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Beach, 87 N. Y. 508, 512 ; Bosley v. Machine Co., 123 N. Y. 550 , 25 N. E. 990 . 1894McCabe v. Brayton, 38 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Beach, 87 N. Y. 508, 512 ; Bosley v. Machine Co., 123 N. Y. 550 , 25 N. E. 990 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
People of the State of New York v. . Beach
green
1 sentence1894McCabe v. Brayton, 38 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Beach, 87 N. Y. 508, 512 ; Bosley v. Machine Co., 123 N. Y. 550 , 25 N. E. 990 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
McCabe v. . Brayton
neutral
1 sentence1894McCabe v. Brayton, 38 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Beach, 87 N. Y. 508, 512 ; Bosley v. Machine Co., 123 N. Y. 550 , 25 N. E. 990 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.