Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Alstongreen1 sentence2026Manzano-Legarda is the party alleging an abuse of discretion, so he bears the burden of showing error. 318 Kan. at 989. 6 Manzano-Legarda doesn't allege any legal or factual error on appeal. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Myersgreen2 sentences2024See State v. Myers, 62 Kan. App. 2d 149, 186 , 509 P.3d 563 (person alleging a violation of his constitutional right to equal protection bears the burden of showing a violation), rev. denied 316 Kan. 762 (2022). 2024See State v. Myers, 62 Kan. App. 2d 149, 186 , 509 P.3d 563 (person alleging a violation of his constitutional right to equal protection bears the burden of showing a violation), rev. denied 316 Kan. 762 (2022). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Crosbygreen2 sentences2023See State v. Crosby, 312 Kan. 630 , 635, 479 P.3d 167 (2021). 2023See State v. Crosby, 312 Kan. 630 , 635, 479 P.3d 167 (2021). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Butlergreen1 sentence2022Butler, 315 Kan. at 21. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Millergreen1 sentence2020See Miller, 308 Kan. at 1138. 10 When considering whether evidence is admissible, a district court first must determine whether it is relevant—that is, whether it is both material and probative. | 1 | 1 |
Gannon v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Gannon v. State , 305 Kan. 850 , 868, 390 P.3d 461 (2017). 2019See Gannon v. State , 305 Kan. 850 , 868, 390 P.3d 461 (2017). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Navarrogreen2 sentences2005See State v. Navarro, 272 Kan. 573, 588 , 35 P.3d 802 (2001). 2005See State v. Navarro, 272 Kan. 573, 588 , 35 P.3d 802 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Adoption of Chancegreen2 sentences1987It was noted in In re Adoption of Chance, 4 Kan. 1987It was noted in In re Adoption of Chance, 4 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bennington
green
2 sentences2025The prosecution, as the party benefiting from the error, bears the burden of showing the error was harmless. 293 Kan. at 524 . 2024The prosecution, as the party benefiting from the error, bears the burden of showing the error was harmless. 293 Kan. at 524 . | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Crease v. State
green
2 sentences1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). 1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). | 2 | 1993–1996 |
State v. Garcia
green
2 sentences1993On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights. [State v.] Garcia, 233 Kan. [589,] 596 [, 664 P.2d 1343 (1983)].” 252 Kan. at 334 . 1993Garcia, 233 Kan. at 596 . | 2 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Peters
green
2 sentences2026State v. Peters, 319 Kan. 492 , 497-98, 555 P.3d 1134 (2024). 6 Sublett argues that the court applied incorrect legal standards when evaluating two statutory mitigating circumstances tied to his mental state. 2026State v. Peters, 319 Kan. 492 , 497-98, 555 P.3d 1134 (2024). 6 Sublett argues that the court applied incorrect legal standards when evaluating two statutory mitigating circumstances tied to his mental state. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Randle
green
1 sentence2022Randle, 311 Kan. at 478 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hopkins v. State
green
1 sentence2001The burden of showing immunity under the KTCA is “placed upon the governmental entity or employee to establish entitlement to any of the exceptions set forth in K.S.A. 75-6104.” 237 Kan. at 609 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Bowser
green
2 sentences1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). 1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Johnson-Howell
red
2 sentences1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). 1996Before we may declare the error harmless, we must be able to declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.” State v. Johnson-Howell, 255 Kan. 928, 944-45 , 881 P.2d 1288 (1994). “ ‘On appeal, the defendant has the burden of showing the error substantially prejudiced his or her rights.’ ” State v. Bowser, 252 Kan. 582, 589 , 847 P.2d 1231 (1993), quoting Crease v. State, 252 Kan. 326, 334 , 845 P.2d 27 (1993). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.