24 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1927–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Giffin v. Smithgreen2 sentences2008See Giffin v. Smith , 688 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding). 2003Giffin v. Smith , 688 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding); Riverside Hosp., Inc. v. Garza , 894 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1995, orig. proceeding) ("The party asserting privilege has the burden of proof to establish the existence of the privilege."). | 4 | 4 |
Torres v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Torres v. State, 182 S.W.3d 899, 902 (Tex. Crim. 2015Torres v. State, 182 S.W.3d 899, 902 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Riverside Hospital, Inc. v. Garzagreen2 sentences2003Giffin v. Smith , 688 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding); Riverside Hosp., Inc. v. Garza , 894 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1995, orig. proceeding) ("The party asserting privilege has the burden of proof to establish the existence of the privilege."). 2003Giffin v. Smith , 688 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding) ; Riverside Hosp., Inc. v. Garza , 894 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, orig. proceeding ) (“The party asserting privilege has the burden of proof to establish the existence of the privilege.”). | 2 | 2 |
Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.green2 sentences2001Texas Health Facilities Comm'n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. , 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex. 1984); Continental Cars, Inc. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm'n , 697 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tex. App. 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1992Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc., 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex.1984); Continental Cars, Inc. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm’n, 697 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). *903 We may not substitute our discretion or our judgment for that of the agency; we may reverse an agency’s decision only if it is unsupported by substantial evidence, is arbitrary, or results from an abuse of discretion. | 2 | 2 |
Continental Cars, Inc. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Commissiongreen2 sentences2001Texas Health Facilities Comm'n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc. , 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex. 1984); Continental Cars, Inc. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm'n , 697 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tex. App. 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1992Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc., 665 S.W.2d 446, 453 (Tex.1984); Continental Cars, Inc. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm’n, 697 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tex.App.1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). *903 We may not substitute our discretion or our judgment for that of the agency; we may reverse an agency’s decision only if it is unsupported by substantial evidence, is arbitrary, or results from an abuse of discretion. | 2 | 2 |
City of El Paso v. Public Utility Commission of Texasgreen2 sentences1993Id. at 902 (citations omitted). 1993Id. at 902 (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
McCandless v. Stategreen2 sentences1976See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion).” See also McKittrick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 541 S.W.2d 177 ; Pete v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 841 . 1974See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App. 1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion). | 2 | 2 |
Englander Co. v. Kennedygreen2 sentences1992See Englander Co. v. Kennedy , 428 S.W.2d 806, 807 (Tex. 1968). 1973Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Sup., 1968); Community Savings & Loan Association of Fredericksburg v. Citizens National Bank of Waco, 484 S.W.2d 116 (Waco Civ.App., 1972, writ dism.). | 1 | 2 |
Ferguson v. DRG/Colony North, Ltd.green1 sentence2020See Ferguson v. DRG/Colony N., Ltd., 764 S.W.2d 874, 885 (Tex. App.—Austin 1989, writ denied) (“A party on appeal may not complain of errors which do not injuriously affect him or which merely affect the rights of others.”). | 1 | 1 |
Peetz v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Peetz v. State, 180 S.W.3d 755, 758 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767-68 (1995)); see also Moss v. State, 877 S.W.2d 895, 899 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (“On appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing error by the trial court; there is no burden on the state on appeal to convince us that its strikes were 5 race neutral.”). | 1 | 1 |
Purkett v. Elemgreen1 sentence2015See Peetz v. State, 180 S.W.3d 755, 758 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767-68 (1995)); see also Moss v. State, 877 S.W.2d 895, 899 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (“On appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing error by the trial court; there is no burden on the state on appeal to convince us that its strikes were 5 race neutral.”). | 1 | 1 |
Moss v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Peetz v. State, 180 S.W.3d 755, 758 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (citing Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767-68 (1995)); see also Moss v. State, 877 S.W.2d 895, 899 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (“On appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing error by the trial court; there is no burden on the state on appeal to convince us that its strikes were 5 race neutral.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Webb v. State
green
2 sentences2004Id. 2004Id. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Torres v. State
green
2 sentences1976See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion).” See also McKittrick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 541 S.W.2d 177 ; Pete v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 841 . 1974See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App. 1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion). | 2 | 1974–1976 |
Meadoux v. State
green
1 sentence2016Meadoux, 325 S.W.3d at 194 n.7. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013In re State Farm Lloyds, 170 S.W.3d at 634 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Delgado v. Hernandez
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Pete v. State
green
1 sentence1976See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion).” See also McKittrick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 541 S.W.2d 177 ; Pete v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 841 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
McKittrick v. State
green
1 sentence1976See McCandless v. State, 425 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Torres v. State, 422 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (Concurring Opinion).” See also McKittrick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 541 S.W.2d 177 ; Pete v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 841 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Harris v. State
green
1 sentence1976The above rights are continuing rights which can be urged by me at any stage of the proceedings, and I do hereby voluntarily waive these rights and give to the said Alvin P. Johnson the person to whom this statement is being made, the following statement:” In Harris v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 516 S.W.2d 931 , at page 936, we said: “The mere signing of a boilerplate statement to the effect that an accused is knowingly waiving his rights will not discharge the prosecution’s burden of showing waiver, but is a factor to be considered in determining if the accused affirmatively waived his rights. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Community Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fredericksburg v. Citizens National Bank of Waco
neutral
1 sentence1973Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Sup., 1968); Community Savings & Loan Association of Fredericksburg v. Citizens National Bank of Waco, 484 S.W.2d 116 (Waco Civ.App., 1972, writ dism.). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Bradshaw v. Abrams
green
1 sentence1955Abrams v. Bradshaw, Tex.Civ.App., 2 S.W.2d 917 , affirmed by Supreme Court, Tex.Com.App., 24 S.W.2d 372 ; Harvey v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Abrams v. Bradshaw
green
1 sentence1955Abrams v. Bradshaw, Tex.Civ.App., 2 S.W.2d 917 , affirmed by Supreme Court, Tex.Com.App., 24 S.W.2d 372 ; Harvey v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.
green
1 sentence1954“I tell you, as I view the matter, I don’t think a man ought to be rewarded under those circumstances, and this jury ought to tell him to go back and clean up his own back yard and if somebody invades his rights then he would have some standing in Court.” In Aultman v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co., Tex.Sup., 260 S.W.2d 596, 599 , Judge Calvert said that before a judgment could be reversed on account of argument “the argument must be improper, and it must be such as to satisfy the reviewing court that it was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause the rendition of an improper judgmen | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Texas Power & Light Co. v. Hering
green
2 sentences1954“I tell you, as I view the matter, I don’t think a man ought to be rewarded under those circumstances, and this jury ought to tell him to go back and clean up his own back yard and if somebody invades his rights then he would have some standing in Court.” In Aultman v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co., Tex.Sup., 260 S.W.2d 596, 599 , Judge Calvert said that before a judgment could be reversed on account of argument “the argument must be improper, and it must be such as to satisfy the reviewing court that it was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause the rendition of an improper judgmen 1954“I tell you, as I view the matter, I don’t think a man ought to be rewarded under those circumstances, and this jury ought to tell him to go back and clean up his own back yard and if somebody invades his rights then he would have some standing in Court.” In Aultman v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co., Tex.Sup., 260 S.W.2d 596, 599 , Judge Calvert said that before a judgment could be reversed on account of argument “the argument must be improper, and it must be such as to satisfy the reviewing court that it was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause the rendition of an improper judgmen | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Brady v. Kreuger
green
1 sentence1927Brady v. Kreuger, 8 S. D. 464, 66 N. W. 1083 , 59 Am. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.