Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Solnick v. Whalengreen1 sentence2007Therefore, “it is necessary to examine the substance of that action to identify the relationship out of which the claim arises and the relief sought” (Solnick v Whalen, 49 NY2d 224, 229 [1980]; see Hartnett v New York City Tr. | 1 | 1 |
MTR. OF AT/COMM, INC. v. Tufogreen1 sentence1995(Matter of AT/ Comm v Tufo, 86 NY2d 1, 6 [1995]; Matter of Citiwide News, 62 NY2d, at 472 , supra,) 5 Because New York City Charter § 384 does not directly apply to the sale of the WNYC radio stations or to the property of the City in a general sense, this court will not read it as imposing a competitive bidding requirement in this case. | 1 | 1 |
Ross v. Wilsongreen1 sentence1995Although often this means getting the best price (see, Matter of Ross v Wilson, 308 NY 605, 612 [1955]), other factors are appropriately considered. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. Erie County
green
1 sentence2002We find no authority which supports a rule that a municipality, while acting in either capacity, may bind future boards to a contract for professional services, absent express legislative authority for doing so (see, Murphy v Erie County, 34 AD2d 295, 298 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Citiwide News, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority
green
1 sentence1995(Matter of AT/ Comm v Tufo, 86 NY2d 1, 6 [1995]; Matter of Citiwide News, 62 NY2d, at 472 , supra,) 5 Because New York City Charter § 384 does not directly apply to the sale of the WNYC radio stations or to the property of the City in a general sense, this court will not read it as imposing a competitive bidding requirement in this case. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of Rochester
green
1 sentence1994Therefore, this court finds that section 313 (b) (2) of the New Charter is not a "revision, simplification, consolidation, codification or restatement” of section 343 (b) of the Old Charter, and is subject to the competitive bidding requirement of General Municipal Law § 103 (Associated Bldrs. & Contrs. v City of Rochester, 67 NY2d 854, 856 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Kaskel v. Impellitteri
green
1 sentence1990Such attempts can be dealt with if and when they are made.” (Supra, 306 NY, at 81 .) In the instant appeal, appellant asserts that the City has labeled prime real estate "substandard” without any factual basis therefor and is attempting to resuscitate an urban renewal project which was long ago successfully completed in order to evade the Charter’s competitive bidding requirement. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity v. Tax Commission
green
1 sentence1982(Matter of Mandle v Brown, 5 NY2d 51 ; Matter of Holy Spirit Assn, for Unification of World Christianity v Tax Comm. of City of N. Y, 62 AD2d 188, 194-196 , mot for lv to app den 45 NY2d 706 .) An assessment could then be made of whether or not Wildcat’s contract is exempt from the competitive bidding requirement. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Mandle v. Brown
green
1 sentence1982(Matter of Mandle v Brown, 5 NY2d 51 ; Matter of Holy Spirit Assn, for Unification of World Christianity v Tax Comm. of City of N. Y, 62 AD2d 188, 194-196 , mot for lv to app den 45 NY2d 706 .) An assessment could then be made of whether or not Wildcat’s contract is exempt from the competitive bidding requirement. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Marine Midland Trust Co. v. Village of Waverly
green
1 sentence1978In asserting its position that the agreement is void for failing to adhere to the competitive bidding requirement, the defendant strays from that issue in relying upon Marine Midland Trust Co. of Southern N. Y. v Village of Waverly ( 42 Misc 2d 704 , affd 21 AD2d 753 ) and an opinion of the State Comptroller (25 Opns St Comp, 1969, p 114), both of which related to purported leases which were in fact installment purchase agreements in violation of the Local Finance Law. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.