Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 5 courts 1937–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Simon v. Granite Building 2, LLCgreen1 sentence2015In opposition, the Criterion defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; Simon v Granite Bldg. 2, LLC, 114 AD3d at 755). | 1 | 1 |
Corning Glass Works v. Ovsanikgreen2 sentences1998A "close scrutiny" of the record, as required here ( Matter of Corning Glass Works v Ovsanik , supra , 84 NY2d, at 626), reveals no substantial actual prejudice. 1998A "close scrutiny” of the record, as required here (Matter of Corning Glass Works v Ovsanik, supra, 84 NY2d, at 626), reveals no substantial actual prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
In re Title Guarantee and Trust Co.green2 sentences1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi 1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.green1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zuckerman v. City of New York
green
1 sentence2015In opposition, the Criterion defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; Simon v Granite Bldg. 2, LLC, 114 AD3d at 755). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence2004Nor does the motion court’s discerned public policy against clients’ exploitation of billing arrangements for legal fees meet the two-pronged criterion for a violation sufficient to disturb an arbitral award, since a court cannot conclude, without extensive fact finding or legal analysis, that a law absolutely prohibits such conduct, and since the arbitrator’s award did not violate any well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law of this state (Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, 1 NY3d at 80 ). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Rosemond
green
1 sentence1978As the Court of Appeals said in People v Rosemond ( 26 NY2d 101, 104-105 ): "But reasonable ground to suspect a felony goes forward should not be the sole criterion on which inquiry may be activated. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Silver
green
1 sentence1975(People v Silver, supra, pp 481-482 ; emphasis supplied.) Although Silver involves a consideration of the insanity defense during a trial, there appears no basis in logic or law to refuse defendant in a competency hearing the use of the same criterion or test in attacking the presumption of sanity as would apply during trial. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. Weaver
green
1 sentence1973The criterion for a violation for driving while intoxicated Was established early in the automobile era and prechemical analysis, and it was * ‘ that one shall not be affected by alcoholic beverage to such an extent as to impair his judgment or his ability to operate an automobile ” (People v. Weaver, 188 App. Div. 395, 400 ). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Warner v. . Durant
green
1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1937–1937 |
In re Pratt
green
1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Brundage v. . Brundage
neutral
1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1937–1937 |
In re the Estate of Williams
green
1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1937–1937 |
In re Brooklyn Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1937(Matter of Seymour, 239 N. Y. 259, 262, 263 ; Matter of Brooklyn Trust Co., 179 App. Div. 262, 264 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 613 ; Matter of Sloat, 141 id. 710, 712 ; Matter of Miranda, 151 id. 459, 462.) The remainder gifts to the charities became absolutely vested at the date of death (Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133, 136 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 id. 573, 580, 581; Matter of Gurlitz, 134 Misc. 160, 163 ; Matter of Byles, 157 id. 46, 48; Matter of Sandgren, 160 id. 784, 785), from which time the will spoke (Brundage v. Brundage, 60 N. Y. 544, 548 ; Matter of Williams, 162 Mi | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.