Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Barbonigreen2 sentences2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). 2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). | 4 | 5 |
People v. Reedgreen2 sentences2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). 2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Thomasgreen2 sentences2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). 2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Simmonsgreen2 sentences2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). 2014We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014]; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]), and on defense counsel’s failure to call defendant’s sister as a witness after he was advised that she would exercise her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent (see generally People v Thomas, 51 NY2d 466, 472-473 [1980]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Colburngreen1 sentence2018Thus, defendant's current arguments concerning that juror are not preserved for our review ( see People v Colburn , 123 AD3d 1292, 1295 [2014], lv denied 25 NY3d 950 [2015]). | 1 | 1 |
Fiore v. Zoning Board of Appealsgreen1 sentence2014Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 ), we reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495 ). -2- 1050 KA 11-00299 We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 ; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY2d 39 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Irvin
green
2 sentences2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). 2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Stepney
green
2 sentences2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). 2014Defendant, however, has not met “his burden of showing the absence of a legitimate explanation for th[at] perceived error” (People v Barboni, 21 NY3d 393, 407 [2013]; see People v Reed, 115 AD3d 1334, 1336-1337 [2014]; Irvin, 111 AD3d at 1296 ; Stepney, 93 AD3d at 1298 ). | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Danielson
green
1 sentence2014Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 ), we reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495 ). -2- 1050 KA 11-00299 We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 ; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY2d 39 | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Bleakley
green
1 sentence2014Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 ), we reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495 ). -2- 1050 KA 11-00299 We reject defendant’s contention in his main brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based both on defense counsel’s failure to exercise a for-cause or peremptory challenge with respect to a prospective juror (see People v Simmons, 119 AD3d 1343, 1344 ; see generally People v Barboni, 21 NY2d 39 | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.