Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Delacruz v. DiNapoligreen2 sentences2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu 2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu | 2 | 2 |
Neely v. DiNapoligreen2 sentences2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu 2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu | 2 | 2 |
Wolak v. DiNapoligreen2 sentences2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu 2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu | 2 | 2 |
Felix v. New York State Comptrollergreen2 sentences2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu 2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu | 2 | 2 |
Santorsola v. McCallgreen2 sentences2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu 2013Inasmuch as petitioner acknowledged that firearms training was a job requirement, the record supports a finding that “petitioner’s injury was the ordinary and foreseeable result of his own inattention or misstep during an activity performed in the course of his employment” (Matter of Santorsola v McCall, 302 AD2d 727, 728 [2003]; see Matter of Wolak v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d at 1371 ; Matter of Neely v DiNapoli, 71 AD3d 1367, 1368-1369 [2010]; Matter of DeLaCruz v DiNapoli, 67 AD 3d 1297, 1298 [2009]; Matter of Felix v New York State Comptroller, 28 AD3d 993, 994 [2006]). 2 We reach a similar conclu | 2 | 2 |
Newark Val. Cent Dist v. Perbgreen1 sentence2023Relations Bd., 83 NY2d 315, 320 [1994]). -5- -6- No. 5 promotional and transitional exams at issue here are akin to fees imposed by an agency with plenary authority to set fees for licenses that an employer may demand as a job requirement, such as a driver’s license or professional license. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spring v. Broadnax
neutral
1 sentence1999Certainly, it was within the broad grant of statutory authority to respondents to evaluate personnel and determine who shall be eligible for promotion to compose Exam 1529 as they did (see, Matter of Aladin v Schultz, 176 AD2d 205 ; Matter of Spring v Broadnax, 158 AD2d 240, 244 , lv denied 76 NY2d 713 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Aladin v. Schultz
green
1 sentence1999Certainly, it was within the broad grant of statutory authority to respondents to evaluate personnel and determine who shall be eligible for promotion to compose Exam 1529 as they did (see, Matter of Aladin v Schultz, 176 AD2d 205 ; Matter of Spring v Broadnax, 158 AD2d 240, 244 , lv denied 76 NY2d 713 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Ash
neutral
1 sentence1994If we were to review them, we would find that the former is without merit in view of the court’s final instructions thoroughly advising the jury with respect to the People’s burden of proof (People v Pena, 196 AD2d 753 , lv denied 82 NY2d 900 ; People v Caldwell, 196 AD2d 760 , lv denied 82 NY2d 892 ), and as to the latter that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt (see, People v Ash, 191 AD2d 739, 742 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1069 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
People v. Pena
neutral
1 sentence1994If we were to review them, we would find that the former is without merit in view of the court’s final instructions thoroughly advising the jury with respect to the People’s burden of proof (People v Pena, 196 AD2d 753 , lv denied 82 NY2d 900 ; People v Caldwell, 196 AD2d 760 , lv denied 82 NY2d 892 ), and as to the latter that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt (see, People v Ash, 191 AD2d 739, 742 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1069 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
People v. Castaneda
green
1 sentence1994If we were to review them, we would find that the former is without merit in view of the court’s final instructions thoroughly advising the jury with respect to the People’s burden of proof (People v Pena, 196 AD2d 753 , lv denied 82 NY2d 900 ; People v Caldwell, 196 AD2d 760 , lv denied 82 NY2d 892 ), and as to the latter that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt (see, People v Ash, 191 AD2d 739, 742 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1069 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In re the Claim of Utley
neutral
1 sentence1992Under the circumstances, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision that claimant’s refusal to perform a job requirement constituted misconduct, thus disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Sabater [Hudacs] 184 AD2d 953 ; Matter of Utley [Levine], 51 AD2d 823 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
In re the Claim of Sabater
neutral
1 sentence1992Under the circumstances, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision that claimant’s refusal to perform a job requirement constituted misconduct, thus disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Sabater [Hudacs] 184 AD2d 953 ; Matter of Utley [Levine], 51 AD2d 823 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Farkas v. New York State Department of Civil Service
neutral
1 sentence1990Serv., 133 AD2d 899 ). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.