Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 New York opinions name it 3 courts 2002–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.green2 sentences2025An anticipatory breach of a contract-also known as an anticipatory repudiation-'can be either a statement by the obligor to the obligee indicating that the obligor will commit a breach that would of itself give the obligee a claim for damages for total breach or a voluntary affirmative act which renders the obligor unable or apparently unable to perform without such a breach' (Norean Power Partners v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 92 NY2d 458, 463 [1998) [internal quotation marks omitted]; see 2B NY PJl2d 4:1 at 35-36 [2017))" (Princes Point LLC v Muss Dev., LLC, 30 NY3d 127 , 133 [2017]). 2024"A repudiation can be either 'a statement by the obligor to the obligee indicating that the obligor will commit a breach that would of itself give the obligee a claim for damages for total breach' or 'a voluntary affirmative act which renders the obligor unable or apparently unable to perform without such a breach'" ( Norcon Power Partners v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. , 92 NY2d 458, 463 [1998], quoting Restatement [Second] of Contracts § 250). | 5 | 6 |
Ga Nun v. . Palmergreen2 sentences2025"For an anticipatory repudiation to be deemed to have occurred, the expression of intent not to perform by the repudiator must be 'positive and unequivocal'" (id., quoting Tenavision, Inc. v Neuman, 45 NY2d 145, 150 [1978]; see Ga Nun v Palmer, 202 NY 483,489 (1911)). 2017For an anticipatory repudiation to be deemed to have - 6 - - 7 - No. 92 occurred, the expression of intent not to perform by the repudiator must be “positive and unequivocal” (Tenavision, Inc. v Neuman, 45 NY2d 145, 150 [1978]; see Ga Nun v Palmer, 202 NY 483, 489 [1911]). | 2 | 2 |
Tenavision, Inc. v. Neumangreen2 sentences2025"For an anticipatory repudiation to be deemed to have occurred, the expression of intent not to perform by the repudiator must be 'positive and unequivocal'" (id., quoting Tenavision, Inc. v Neuman, 45 NY2d 145, 150 [1978]; see Ga Nun v Palmer, 202 NY 483,489 (1911)). 2017For an anticipatory repudiation to be deemed to have - 6 - - 7 - No. 92 occurred, the expression of intent not to perform by the repudiator must be “positive and unequivocal” (Tenavision, Inc. v Neuman, 45 NY2d 145, 150 [1978]; see Ga Nun v Palmer, 202 NY 483, 489 [1911]). | 2 | 2 |
Computer Possibilities Unlimited, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.green2 sentences2024Put another way, "a party repudiates a contract 'where that party, before the time of performance arrives, puts it out of his power to keep his contract'" ( Computer Possibilities Unlimited v Mobil Oil Corp. , 301 AD2d 70, 77 [1st Dept 2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003] quoting Union Ins. 2024Put another way, "a party repudiates a contract 'where that party, before the time of performance arrives, puts it out of his power to keep his contract'" ( Computer Possibilities Unlimited v Mobil Oil Corp. , 301 AD2d 70, 77 [1st Dept 2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003] quoting Union Ins. | 2 | 2 |
Princes Point LLC v. Muss Development L.L.C.green2 sentences2025An anticipatory breach of a contract-also known as an anticipatory repudiation-'can be either a statement by the obligor to the obligee indicating that the obligor will commit a breach that would of itself give the obligee a claim for damages for total breach or a voluntary affirmative act which renders the obligor unable or apparently unable to perform without such a breach' (Norean Power Partners v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 92 NY2d 458, 463 [1998) [internal quotation marks omitted]; see 2B NY PJl2d 4:1 at 35-36 [2017))" (Princes Point LLC v Muss Dev., LLC, 30 NY3d 127 , 133 [2017]). 2024L.L.C., 30 NY3d 127 , 133 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].) Holdco's Notice unequivocally demonstrates its intent to seek: (1) stockholder approval for the cashless Halsa Merger, (2) additional financing from a third-party lender, and (3) to amend and restate OpCo's Certificates of Incorporation. | 1 | 4 |
Palmetto Partners, L.P. v. AJW Qualified Partners, LLCgreen2 sentences2023L.L.C. , 30 NY3d at 133 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Palmetto Partners, L.P. v AJW Qualified Partners, LLC , 83 AD3d 804, 807 ). "[U]nder the doctrine of anticipatory repudiation, where one party repudiates its contractual obligations prior to the time designated for performance, the nonrepudiating party may immediately claim damages for total breach and be absolved from its obligations of future performance" ( Palmetto Partners, L.P. v AJW Qualified Partners, LLC , 83 AD3d at 806-807 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Princes Point LLC v Muss Dev. 2023L.L.C. , 30 NY3d at 133 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Palmetto Partners, L.P. v AJW Qualified Partners, LLC , 83 AD3d 804, 807 ). "[U]nder the doctrine of anticipatory repudiation, where one party repudiates its contractual obligations prior to the time designated for performance, the nonrepudiating party may immediately claim damages for total breach and be absolved from its obligations of future performance" ( Palmetto Partners, L.P. v AJW Qualified Partners, LLC , 83 AD3d at 806-807 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Princes Point LLC v Muss Dev. | 1 | 1 |
Briarwood Farms, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.green1 sentence2016Whether a party *117 has anticipatorily breached a contract is ordinarily a question of fact reserved for a jury, but a court may decide the issue as a matter of law when the purported repudiation is embodied in an unambiguous writing (see Briarwood Farms, Inc. v Toll Bros., Inc., 452 Fed Appx 59, 61 [2d Cir 2011]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
EPAC Tech., Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2024“A repudiation can be either a statement by the obligor to the obligee indicating that the obligor will commit a breach that would of itself give the obligee a claim for damages for total breach or a voluntary affirmative act which renders the obligor unable or apparently unable to perform without such a breach” (EPAC Tech., Inc. v John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 225 AD3d 53 , 57, 205 NYS3d 372 [1st Dept 2024] [internal quotations and citations omitted]). 2024Such a communication "can be either 'a statement by the obligor to the obligee indicating that the obligor will commit a breach that would of itself give the obligee a claim for damages for total breach' or 'a voluntary affirmative act which renders the obligor unable or apparently unable to perform without such a breach"' (EPAC Tech., Inc. v John JiViley & Sons, Inc., 225 AD3d 53 , 57 [1st Dept 2024]). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.