sanity hearing (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

sanity hearing in New York

7 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Keith v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Systemgreen
nyappdiv · 1974 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
1 sentence

1977A reading of the record indicates that the Criminal Term did not abuse its discretion in failing to order a sanity hearing sua sponte (see People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805 ; see, also, People v Mac Cumber, 46 AD2d 938 ).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Secor v. Baron Motor Carriers, Inc. neutral
nyappdiv · 1975
2 sentences

1979We reiterate that there is no statutory provision in this State which requires a court to order a sanity hearing sua sponte whenever defendant has a history of mental problems (People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805 ; cf. People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167 ).

1977A reading of the record indicates that the Criminal Term did not abuse its discretion in failing to order a sanity hearing sua sponte (see People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805 ; see, also, People v Mac Cumber, 46 AD2d 938 ).

31977–1979
People v. Whitfield neutral
nycountyct · 1978
1 sentence

2012In People v Whitfield ( 97 Misc 2d 236 [Monroe County Ct 1978]), an issue in the case centered around the defendant’s attorney’s participation in the examination, involving a sanity defense.

12012–2012
People v. Armlin green
ny · 1975
1 sentence

1979We reiterate that there is no statutory provision in this State which requires a court to order a sanity hearing sua sponte whenever defendant has a history of mental problems (People v Rivera, 50 AD2d 805 ; cf. People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167 ).

11979–1979
People v. Armlin neutral
nyappdiv · 1973
1 sentence

1975There is no statute which requires a sanity hearing in every instance in which it is claimed that the defendant has a mental problem or a history of psychiatric treatment (People v Armlin, 43 AD2d 782 ).

11975–1975
People v. Nicholson green
ny · 1962
1 sentence

1975Nor was a Huntley hearing required since “The issue as to whether the confession was illegally obtained is waived by the guilty plea” where a defendant has knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty (People v Nicholson, 11 NY2d 1067, 1068 ).

11975–1975
People v. Silver green
ny · 1974
1 sentence

1975(People v Silver, supra, pp 481-482 .) The defendant here effectively rebutted the sanity presumption, by the introduction of prior psychiatric reports which tended to establish incompetency.

11975–1975
People of State of New York v. Pugach green
nybronxctyct · 1962
1 sentence

1972The County Court order provided that, pursuant to People v. Hudson (19 N Y 2d 137), the relator should have his hearing before a Judge other than Judge Martinis, who presided at Pugach’s trial and at the original sanity hearing ( 33 Misc 2d 938 ).

11972–1972

Where else courts name it

IL 80 (1951–2009) CA 43 (1951–2025) LA 34 (1962–2014) TX 20 (1970–2009) FL 11 (1967–2017) OK 7 (1951–2011) MO 7 (1945–1983) NY 7 (1972–2012) AZ 6 (1960–1978) IN 4 (1972–2024) MI 4 (1971–1988) MD 3 (1968–2015) AL 3 (1968–1974) PA 3 (1969–1974) OH 3 (1914–2015) MS 3 (1963–2009) SC 3 (1981–2007) WI 3 (1965–2026) KS 3 (1948–1978) MA 2 (2000–2018) TN 2 (1968–2011) NV 2 (1977–1977) KY 2 (1963–1971) WA 2 (1970–2021) CO 2 (1970–1971)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check