Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2020Cuyahoga No. 97698, 2012-Ohio-3812, ¶ 18 (relying on Steffen in affirming an aggravated burglary conviction and concluding that, even if the defendant had permission to enter the victim’s residence, that permission was revoked when the defendant committed an “act of violence against a person who has the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry”); State v. Hill, 8th Dist. 2014Cuyahoga No. 97698, 2012-Ohio-3812, ¶ 18 (relying on Steffen in affirming an aggravated burglary conviction and concluding that, even if the defendant had permission to enter the victim’s residence, that permission was revoked when the defendant committed an “act of violence against a person who has the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry”); State v. Hill, 8th Dist. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Steffengreen2 sentences2026In State v. Steffen, we were persuaded by the fact that the felony subsequently committed on the premises was “one of violence, directed against a human being who had the ability and the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry, if such privilege was in fact granted.” 31 Ohio St.3d 111, 115 (1987). {¶ 138} One year later, we reinstated a conviction of aggravated murder while committing an aggravated burglary under circumstances that were similar to 50 January Term, 2026 those in Steffen, holding that “the jury could justifiably infer that the victim withdrew consent when [the defenda 2023Where a guest has a privilege to be in a home, that privilege may be revoked upon the commission of an act of violence against a person “who has the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry.” State v. Steffen, 31 Ohio St.3d 111, 115 , 509 N.E.2d 383 (1987); State v. Johnson, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97698, 2012-Ohio- 3812, ¶ 18. | 1 | 7 |
State v. Hillgreen2 sentences2020Cuyahoga No. 95379, 2011-Ohio-2523, ¶ 25 . 2014Cuyahoga No. 95379, 2011-Ohio-2523, ¶ 25 (same). {¶36} The state’s evidence demonstrated that, on all three occasions, Campbell committed a violent crime against the victim while inside the victim’s residence. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Hollowaygreen1 sentence2026In State v. Steffen, we were persuaded by the fact that the felony subsequently committed on the premises was “one of violence, directed against a human being who had the ability and the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry, if such privilege was in fact granted.” 31 Ohio St.3d 111, 115 (1987). {¶ 138} One year later, we reinstated a conviction of aggravated murder while committing an aggravated burglary under circumstances that were similar to 50 January Term, 2026 those in Steffen, holding that “the jury could justifiably infer that the victim withdrew consent when [the defenda | 1 | 1 |
State v. Clintongreen1 sentence2026In State v. Steffen, we were persuaded by the fact that the felony subsequently committed on the premises was “one of violence, directed against a human being who had the ability and the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry, if such privilege was in fact granted.” 31 Ohio St.3d 111, 115 (1987). {¶ 138} One year later, we reinstated a conviction of aggravated murder while committing an aggravated burglary under circumstances that were similar to 50 January Term, 2026 those in Steffen, holding that “the jury could justifiably infer that the victim withdrew consent when [the defenda | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Knuff
green
1 sentence2026In State v. Steffen, we were persuaded by the fact that the felony subsequently committed on the premises was “one of violence, directed against a human being who had the ability and the authority to revoke the privilege of initial entry, if such privilege was in fact granted.” 31 Ohio St.3d 111, 115 (1987). {¶ 138} One year later, we reinstated a conviction of aggravated murder while committing an aggravated burglary under circumstances that were similar to 50 January Term, 2026 those in Steffen, holding that “the jury could justifiably infer that the victim withdrew consent when [the defenda | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Fontes
green
2 sentences2011The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected this assignment of error. argument, holding that “for purposes of defining the offense of aggravated burglary, a defendant may form the purpose to commit a criminal offense at any point during the course of a trespass.” State v. Fontes, 87 Ohio St.3d 527, 530 , 2000-Ohio-472 , 721 N.E.2d 1037 . 2011The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected this assignment of error. argument, holding that “for purposes of defining the offense of aggravated burglary, a defendant may form the purpose to commit a criminal offense at any point during the course of a trespass.” State v. Fontes, 87 Ohio St.3d 527, 530 , 2000-Ohio-472 , 721 N.E.2d 1037 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Fontes
green
1 sentence2011The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected this assignment of error. argument, holding that “for purposes of defining the offense of aggravated burglary, a defendant may form the purpose to commit a criminal offense at any point during the course of a trespass.” State v. Fontes, 87 Ohio St.3d 527, 530 , 2000-Ohio-472 , 721 N.E.2d 1037 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.