Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Grimsleygreen2 sentences2014See id. at ¶ 17; see also Miller v. Grimsley, 197 Ohio App.3d 167 , 2011-Ohio-6049 , 966 N.E.2d 932 (10th Dist.) (holding that, in a breach-of-contract action involving a single contract and multiple claims, it was not possible to separate attorney hours on a claim-by-claim basis). {¶26} Here, after HCI filed its motion for attorney fees and costs, the trial court continued the matter for an evidentiary hearing. 2014See id. at ¶ 17; see also Miller v. Grimsley, 197 Ohio App.3d 167 , 2011-Ohio-6049 , 966 N.E.2d 932 (10th Dist.) (holding that, in a breach-of-contract action involving a single contract and multiple claims, it was not possible to separate attorney hours on a claim-by-claim basis). {¶26} Here, after HCI filed its motion for attorney fees and costs, the trial court continued the matter for an evidentiary hearing. | 2 | 2 |
BancOhio National Bank v. Schiesswohlgreen2 sentences2000See Schiesswohl, supra. As is stated above, appellant Leonard Revels, in the Affidavit attached to the Motion for Relief from Judgment, specifically stated in part as follows: "I have legitimate defenses to the lawsuit. 1999BancOhio National Bank v. Schiesswohl (1988), 51 Ohio App.3d 130 , syllabus one. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Hartmangreen1 sentence2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . | 1 | 1 |
Hinton v. Alabamagreen1 sentence2025Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S. 263, 273 (2014). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Keith
green
2 sentences2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . 2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Madrigal
green
2 sentences2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . 2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . 2025See [State v.] Hartman, 93 Ohio St.3d [274] at 299, 754 N.E.2d 1150 ; State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 391 , 721 N.E.2d 52 (2000); State v. Keith, 79 Ohio St.3d 514, 536 , 684 N.E.2d 47 (1997); State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966 , 15 N.E.3d 818, ¶ 75 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Turnmire v. Ostrowski
neutral
1 sentence2014Stark Nos. 2013CA00042, 2013CA00099, 2013 -Ohio- 5154 , this Court reversed the judgment of the Juvenile Court and remanded the matter for an evidentiary hearing on the issues of sufficiency of process and personal jurisdiction. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Kidd
green
2 sentences2008State v. Kidd , 168 Ohio App.3d 382 , 2006-Ohio-4008 . 2008State v. Kidd , 168 Ohio App.3d 382 , 2006-Ohio-4008 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.