Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garcia-Contrerasgreen2 sentences2004Perez, 115 Ariz. at 31 , 563 P.2d at 286 ; Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 145, ¶ 2 , 953 P.2d at 537 ; Cook, 115 Ariz. at 149-50 , 564 P.2d at 100-01 . 2004Perez, 115 Ariz. at 31 , 563 P.2d at 286 ; Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 145, ¶ 2 , 953 P.2d at 537 ; Cook, 115 Ariz. at 149-50 , 564 P.2d at 100-01 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cook
green
2 sentences1995On appeal, this court found the record insufficient to support that finding, and remanded the matter for an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasons for Cook’s absence at trial. 115 Ariz. at 150 , 564 P.2d at 101 . 1995On appeal, this court found the record insufficient to support that finding, and remanded the matter for an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasons for Cook’s absence at trial. 115 Ariz. at 150 , 564 P.2d at 101 . | 2 | 1995–2004 |
State v. Derello
green
1 sentence2007Id. 2 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Perez
green
2 sentences2004Perez, 115 Ariz. at 31 , 563 P.2d at 286 ; Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 145, ¶ 2 , 953 P.2d at 537 ; Cook, 115 Ariz. at 149-50 , 564 P.2d at 100-01 . 2004Perez, 115 Ariz. at 31 , 563 P.2d at 286 ; Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 145, ¶ 2 , 953 P.2d at 537 ; Cook, 115 Ariz. at 149-50 , 564 P.2d at 100-01 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Bilke
green
2 sentences1990Id. at 53-54 , 781 P.2d at 30-31 . 1990Id. at 53-54 , 781 P.2d at 30-31 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Tison v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1989We, in turn, remanded the case to the Yuma County Superior Court “for such Enmund findings as may be appropriate under Tison v. Arizona [ 481 U.S. 137 , 107 S.Ct. 1676 , 95 L.Ed.2d 127 (1987)] No. 84-6075, United States Supreme Court, decided April 21, 1987, and for resentencing.” Following our remand, the trial judge originally set the matter for an evidentiary hearing. 1989We, in turn, remanded the case to the Yuma County Superior Court “for such Enmund findings as may be appropriate under Tison v. Arizona [ 481 U.S. 137 , 107 S.Ct. 1676 , 95 L.Ed.2d 127 (1987)] No. 84-6075, United States Supreme Court, decided April 21, 1987, and for resentencing.” Following our remand, the trial judge originally set the matter for an evidentiary hearing. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
City of Phoenix v. Space Data Corporation
green
2 sentences1975NOTES [1] A.R.S. § 9-672.02 (Supp. 1974) amended in 1970, now specifically authorizes all cities to condemn for off-street parking. [1a] On April 16, 1975, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Phoenix v. Space Data Corporation, 111 Ariz. 528 , 534 P.2d 428 . 1975NOTES [1] A.R.S. § 9-672.02 (Supp. 1974) amended in 1970, now specifically authorizes all cities to condemn for off-street parking. [1a] On April 16, 1975, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Phoenix v. Space Data Corporation, 111 Ariz. 528 , 534 P.2d 428 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.