Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pisani v. Pisanigreen2 sentences2026Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 at ¶ 18 . “‘[W]here the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant,’ a hearing is unnecessary.” Id., quoting Pisani v. Pisani, 101 Ohio App.3d 83, 88 (8th Dist. 1995). 2025Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 at ¶ 18 . “‘[W]here the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant,’ a hearing is unnecessary.” Id., quoting Pisani v. Pisani, 101 Ohio App.3d 83, 88 (8th Dist. 1995). | 2 | 3 |
Wilson v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2025Moreover, “a hearing on a motion for sanctions is not required ‘where the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant.’” Gamage, 2023-Ohio-4541, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), quoting Wilson v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-1752, ¶ 39 (8th Dist.). 2024July 19, 2001) (“Without a transcript or statement of the evidence, this court must presume regularity.”) And in so doing, we are cognizant that a trial court is not required to hold a hearing pursuant to R.C. 2323.51 if “the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant.” Wilson v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-1752, ¶ 39 (8th Dist.) From the briefing and arguments made by the parties, it is apparent the trial court had knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the depositions and the conduct of | 2 | 3 |
MRN Ltd. Partnership v. Gamagegreen1 sentence2025Moreover, “a hearing on a motion for sanctions is not required ‘where the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant.’” Gamage, 2023-Ohio-4541, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), quoting Wilson v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-1752, ¶ 39 (8th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blakemore v. Blakemore
green
2 sentences2026Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 at ¶ 18 . “‘[W]here the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant,’ a hearing is unnecessary.” Id., quoting Pisani v. Pisani, 101 Ohio App.3d 83, 88 (8th Dist. 1995). 2025Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 at ¶ 18 . “‘[W]here the court has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances for the denial of the requested relief and the hearing would be perfunctory, meaningless, or redundant,’ a hearing is unnecessary.” Id., quoting Pisani v. Pisani, 101 Ohio App.3d 83, 88 (8th Dist. 1995). | 2 | 2025–2026 |
Schiff v. Dickson
green
2 sentences2023Id.; Schiff v. Dickson, 2013-Ohio-5253 , 4 N.E.3d 433 (8th Dist.) (finding no error where the trial court heard arguments raised at trial). 2023Id.; Schiff v. Dickson, 2013-Ohio-5253 , 4 N.E.3d 433 (8th Dist.) (finding no error where the trial court heard arguments raised at trial). | 1 | 2023–2023 |